Re: [ws-rx] PR33 - Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue back-channel not defined

[Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>]

Matt

I still don't agree that this is right. I think there may be cases where 
there is a new transport level connection. The main point is that the 
response channel is transport-defined not WS-A defined.

Paul

Matthew Lovett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found the last suggestion a bit cumbersome, so I has another go. I hope 
> people like it :)
>
> Add to the glossary:
> Backchannel: When the underlying transport provides a mechanism to return 
> a transport-protocol specific response without initiating a new 
> connection, we refer to this mechanism as a backchannel.
>
> Thanks
>
> Matt
>
>
>   

-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com