[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR33 - Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue back-channel not defined
Rich Yes. We are working on a binding of SOAP to MIME/SMTP and it does say that the response is bound to the SMTP Reply-To in cases where the WSA ReplyTo is anonymous. Paul Richard Salz wrote: >> I still don't agree that this is right. I think there may be cases where >> > > >> there is a new transport level connection. The main point is that the >> response channel is transport-defined not WS-A defined. >> > > Hm. For a SOAP-over-SMTP binding, would you expect the backchannel to be > a response message, the equivalent of the recipient invoking the 'reply' > function on its mail user-agent? (I think the question is interesting; > either there is no back-channel or there is only the back-channel.) I > think it's up to the particular transport binding to say, tho. > > /r$ > > -- > STSM > Senior Security Architect > DataPower SOA Appliances > > > -- Paul Fremantle VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle paul@wso2.com (646) 290 8050 "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]