OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR33 - Re: [ws-rx] NEW Issue back-channel not defined


Rich

Yes. We are working on a binding of SOAP to MIME/SMTP and it does say 
that the response is bound to the SMTP Reply-To in cases where the WSA 
ReplyTo is anonymous.

Paul

Richard Salz wrote:
>> I still don't agree that this is right. I think there may be cases where 
>>     
>
>   
>> there is a new transport level connection. The main point is that the 
>> response channel is transport-defined not WS-A defined.
>>     
>
> Hm.  For a SOAP-over-SMTP binding, would you expect the backchannel to be 
> a response message, the equivalent of the recipient invoking the 'reply' 
> function on its mail user-agent?  (I think the question is interesting; 
> either there is no back-channel or there is only the back-channel.)  I 
> think it's up to the particular transport binding to say, tho.
>
>         /r$
>
> --
> STSM
> Senior Security Architect
> DataPower SOA Appliances
>
>
>   

-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2 
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]