[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] PR022: strawman proposal
I would seriously prefer mandating close
with re-tries as required or indication of a final (empty) sequence message. -bob From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
1.) Adding the mandatory LastMsgNumber element to
CloseSequence. As previously discussed, the description of LastMsgNumber should
be something along the lines of: The
LastMsgNumber element specifies the highest assigned message number of all the
Sequence Traffic Messages for the Sequence being closed. The RM Destination can
use this information, for example, to implement the behavior indicated by
wsrm:CreateSequenceResponse/wsrm:IncompleteSequenceBehavior. 2.) The use of CloseSequence remains optional. Any agreement
between the RMS and the RMD about the use of CloseSequence to allow the RMD to
determine if it has succesfully received all the messages sent by the RMS is
out of scope. 3.) An RMS that sends a CloseSequence but does not receive a
CloseSequenceResponse is free to retry the CloseSequence message or not
depending upon local policy etc. - gp |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]