ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] PR035: multiple DA policies?
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: "Gilbert Pilz" <gpilz@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 18:28:25 -0500
I think we could leave that for the
editors - as I mentioned, I think its an obvious thing.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
"Gilbert Pilz"
<gpilz@bea.com>
02/01/2007 05:50 PM
|
To
| Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
| <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Subject
| RE: [ws-rx] PR035: multiple DA policies? |
|
I wasn't smart enough to
figure this out at the time, but Doug has a point. You could have separate
policies attached to the both binding and endpoint components of a WSDL
description. When you combined these policies it might result in something
like "This endpoint is using both AtLeastOnce and AtMostOnce".
I'm not sure if requiring them to be "semantically equivalent"
would cut it. I'm not sure I know what "semantically equivalent"
even means in this context.
Do we have another issue
here?
- gp
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:38 PM
To: Gilbert Pilz
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR035: multiple DA policies?
Gil was afraid to mention this one the call but this is a potential issue.
I think if we added something like:
If the DA assertion appears in more than one policy alternative,
for a given endpoint, then they MUST all be semantically equivalent.
But maybe its just obvious.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
"Gilbert Pilz"
<gpilz@bea.com>
02/01/2007 02:56 PM
|
To
| <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [ws-rx] PR035: multiple DA policies? |
|
Reading through the proposed changes to WS-RM Policy for PR035 it seems
to me that it is possible for a endpoint to advertise support for multiple
DAs, for example, AtLeastOnce or AtMostOnce. Is this true?
- gp
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]