[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] I just posted a PR comment on MakeConnection Policy assertion
Doug Davis wrote: > > Tom, > you proposed: > Change lines 327 – 329 from: > “ > The MakeConnection policy assertion indicates that the MakeConnection > protocol (operation and the use of the MakeConnection URI template in > EndpointReferences) is supported. This assertion has Endpoint Policy > Subject [WS-PolicyAttachment]. > “ > To > “ > The MakeConnection policy assertion indicates that the MakeConnection > protocol (operation and the use of the MakeConnection URI template in > EndpointReferences) is required for instances of replies. This > assertion has Endpoint Policy Subject [WS-PolicyAttachment]. > “ > Since MC doesn't talk about any EPR in particular I think it would > make more sense to reword as: > “ > The MakeConnection policy assertion indicates that the MakeConnection > protocol (operation and the use of the MakeConnection URI template in > EndpointReferences) is required for messages from this endpoint. This > assertion has Endpoint Policy Subject [WS-PolicyAttachment]. your wording removed "required for instances of replies". Is this because you wish it to be used for requests as well.? > “ > And then you suggested: > Change line 334 from: > “ > A policy assertion that specifies that the MakeConnection protocol is > supported. > “ > To > “ > A policy assertion that specifies that the MakeConnection protocol is > required for instances of replies from an endpoint. > “ > And I would suggest this instead: > “ > A policy assertion that specifies that the MakeConnection protocol is > required for instances of messages from this endpoint. > “ > same question, I assumed makeConnection is for responses, are you are pointing out it can also be used for requests? Tom > As to Paul's question of severity of this change, it would seem that > your text is still consistent with the intent of the original text, > as such it seems like a non-substantive change. Would you agree? > > thanks > -Doug > ______________________________________________________ > STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group > (919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com > ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]