RE: [ws-rx] WS policy framework spec has not changed

["Doug Bunting (WSSP)" <Douglas.R.Bunting@microsoft.com>]

[All, please note: dbunting@microsoft.com is not me.]

Tom,

I'm not entirely sure why we're arguing given our agreement on the ballot.  Charging on anyhow...

How do you account for future revisions when you reference a specific intermediate version?  Where is the text that indicates another subsequent, or even previous, version is acceptable?

thanx,
    doug

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Rutt [mailto:tom@coastin.com]
Sent: March-14-07 17:05
To: Doug Bunting
Cc: wsrx
Subject: [ws-rx] WS policy framework spec has not changed

Doug:

your no vote on wsrx specs has the following comment:
*Comment from Doug Bunting:*

    We cancelled our last ballot for errors in the specification that
    were more minor than an incorrect namespace. First, we learn the
    schema reference to the Policy namespace is incorrect. Now, the
    Policy CR we are referencing will be out of date by the time RM is
    up for a member approval ballot. With these two obvious errors, we
    risk not passing a member approval ballot for the specifications.

    Regretfully, I have to change my vote on the current ballot to no.

The ws-policy attachment CR spec is being republished, to fix some UDDI
related
problems.  However this will not require any namespace changes.

However the WSpolicy framework spec, which is the one referenced by
WSRX, has not had
any indications of changing as of this time.

Thus the wsrx reference to ws policy is still stable.

Tom Rutt

--
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt        email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133