OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Remove references from WSRM to WSRMP


+1 Tom.

Paul

Tom Rutt wrote:
> Doug Davis wrote:
>>
>> hmmm, some interesting things come to mind....
>> - what does section 2.4 (DAs) mean w/o the notion of putting them as 
>> Policy assertions? 
> I see no problem with having the base spec define the meaning of 
> Delivery assurance concepts.
> 
> The policy spec would be defining how to express the delivery assurance 
> as policy assertions suitable
> for ws policy.
> 
> Tom
>> What is a reader expected to do with them w/o some guidance?  Or would 
>> we move these to the WS-RMP spec?
>> - how does removing the reference to WS-RMP help when we have other 
>> references to things like SecurityPolicy - which points to the 
>> submitted version of WSP?  Perhaps we should consider removing all 
>> refs to any kind of policy doc?
>> - If pointing to SecurityPolicy is ok because its a non-normative ref, 
>> then rather than removing refs to WS-RMP, we should just make it a 
>> non-normative one?
>> - If we decouple RM and RMP, then it seems we should do the same for 
>> MC.  Kind of sad since the real content in a WS-MCP spec would be less 
>> than a page.  sigh.  Would you object to including that as part of 
>> this issue/proposal if I did the work to split it out?
>>
>> thanks
>> -Doug
>> ______________________________________________________
>> STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
>> (919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com
>>
>>
>> *Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>*
>>
>> 03/15/2007 05:50 PM
>>
>>     
>> To
>>     "ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
>> cc
>>     
>> Subject
>>     [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] Remove references from WSRM to WSRMP
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I see no reason why WSRM should reference WSRMP. WSRM interoperates and
>> works fine without WSRMP in place. I propose we make the following
>> changes to WSRM:
>>
>> Relative to the latest CD
>>
>> Delete lines 201-203 (reference to wsrmp)
>> On line 378 delete the sentence starting with "These assertions...."
>> until the end of line 379.
>> On line 1786 delete the sentence starting with "See WS-RM Policy..." to
>> the end of line 1787.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> -- 
>> Paul Fremantle
>> VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>>
>> http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
>> paul@wso2.com
>> (646) 290 8050
>>
>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology and Partnerships, WSO2
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
(646) 290 8050

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]