[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 162: Update RM and MC policy assertions per Policy 1.5guidelines
Issue 162 From: Marc Goodner
[mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER. The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
Title: Update RM and MC policy assertions per Policy 1.5 guidelines Protocol: ws-rmp, ws-mc Artifact: spec Type: editorial
Description:
I’ve reviewed the Policy 1.5 guidelines doc and in
general didn’t find much, see attached. The one thing we didn’t do
was handle in prose what to do for wsp:Ignorable according to guidelines 9
(describe in prose) and 10 (describe in XML). In many instances we’ve
handled the XML job by already. The instances where it isn’t handled is
where there is attribute extensibility, say for wsp:Optional, which would
incorrectly permit the use of wsp:Ignorable. So we can pull the RM and MC
assertions into shape from the guidelines perspective by adding prose that it
isn’t allowed. For RM that would be a specific statement for the only
assertion that allows attribute extensibility, and a similar change for the MC
assertion. My suggested text follows. Proposal: For RM Policy, add the following statement to the end of
section 2.2 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200702/wsrmp-1.1-spec-os-01.html#_Toc160540908
The RM policy assertion MUST NOT include the wsp:Ignorable
attribute in its attributes with a value of true. For MC, add the following statement to the end of section
3.4 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702/wsmc-1.0-spec-os-01.html#_Toc162743908 The MakeConnection policy assertion MUST NOT include the
wsp:Ignorable attribute in its attributes with a value of true. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]