During the previous RX TC call, there was mention of upcoming
changes to the OASIS Process Rules (effective March 01) that would allow the RX
TC to submit their specifications for Public Review and OASIS vote without
waiting for the SX specifications. If the RX TC were to proceed based on the
new OASIS process rules, should not the RX spec references to WS-SX
specifications be called “OASIS Standard” instead of “Editors
draft”?
That is, for example,
[SecureConversation] OASIS WS-SX Technical Committee Editor Draft, "WS-271 SecureConversation 1.4" 272 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512
should instead be:
[SecureConversation] OASIS Standard, "WS-SecureConversation 1.4" http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512.
Similar changes follow for WS-Trust and WS-SecurityPolicy
references as well.
I suggest that we avoid editing the RX specifications
every time the SX ones change status by using the project reference text.
Thanks.
From: Doug Davis
[mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:39 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx] v1.2CD01 ready for review
All,
we've
had a ruling from Mary on this and the SX specs are now referred to as
"Editor Draft"s w/o any date at all. The "Latest..."
hrefs are now updated.
WSRM:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27348/wsrm-1.2-spec-cd-01.pdf
WSRMP:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27346/wsrmp-1.2-spec-cd-01.pdf
WSMC:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27347/wsmc-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf
ZIP FILE:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27345/WSRX%20v1.2-CD01.zip
Sorry for any
confusion.
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
|
Doug
Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
02/26/2008
08:50 AM
|
|
To
|
ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[ws-rx]
v1.2CD01 ready for review
|
|
All,
v1.2 CD01 is ready for review. Under the "Latest ..."
hrefs [1] you'll find the pdf version of the files. The zip file [2]
contains everything, including the *-diff.pdf versions if you want to see the
change bars. Things to look for:
- both sets of footers are correct (spec name and date) - "both"
meaning there are two types of footers in the doc (2nd set starts after
page 3)
- title page has the correct version number, name, date and hrefs
- removal of policy 1.2 refs in the normative refs section
- upate of sx (SecPolicy and Trust) refs in the normative refs section
- update of RM refs in the normative refs section
There is still an open question, for Mary, as to whether or not we need to have
the SX dates in the references since those may change.
[1]
Latest RM: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27334/wsrm-1.2-spec-cd-01.pdf
Latest RMP:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27332/wsrmp-1.2-spec-cd-01.pdf
Latest MC: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27333/wsmc-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf
[2]
Latest Zip:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/27331/WSRX%20v1.2-CD01.zip
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com