Re: [ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] typo in MC schema

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

All,
  is there any objection or concern
with this?  Since its such a small change I was thinking that I could
prepare an updated set of doc for the next call.

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com

Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

06/02/2008 07:49 AM

To	ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject	[ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] typo in MC schema

One of our developers noticed that the MCSupported policy assertion is
missing from the MC schema.  Clearly an oversight and given that the
schema is last in order of precedence I believe this can be treated as
a typo. 

Proposal: add the following to the MC schema: 

  <xs:complexType name="MCSupportedType">
    <xs:sequence> 
      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
    </xs:sequence> 
    <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
  </xs:complexType> 
  <xs:element name="MCSupported" type="wsmc:MCSupportedType"/>

thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com