OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [REVISED NEW ISSUE] typo in MC schema



Resending in the latest revised issue/proposal:

Issue: The MC schema is missing the MCSupported policy assertion and it references WS-Addressing even though its not used.  Both of these are typos.

Proposal: 2 changes:

1) add the following to the MC schema:
  <xs:complexType name="MCSupportedType">
    <xs:sequence>
      <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
    </xs:sequence>
    <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
  </xs:complexType>
  <xs:element name="MCSupported" type="wsmc:MCSupportedType"/>

2) Remove the references to the WS-Addressing
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
         
xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
          xmlns:wsmc="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702"  

          targetNamespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702"
          elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified">

 
<xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing"
         
schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2006/03/addressing/ws-addr.xsd"/>

Neither of these have any semantics changes and can be considered typos.

I've attached an updated xsd for those who want to see the end result.


thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com



Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

06/02/2008 07:49 AM

To
ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
[ws-rx] [NEW ISSUE] typo in MC schema






One of our developers noticed that the MCSupported policy assertion is missing from the MC schema.  Clearly an oversight and given that the schema is last in order of precedence I believe this can be treated as a typo.


Proposal: add the following to the MC schema:


 <xs:complexType name="MCSupportedType">

   <xs:sequence>

     <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>

   </xs:sequence>

   <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>

 </xs:complexType>

 <xs:element name="MCSupported" type="wsmc:MCSupportedType"/>


thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com

proposal-wsmc-1.1-schema-200702.xsd



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]