ws-rx message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] New Editors Drafts
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:46:01 -0500
ok - I've updated all docs with this
change. New links are:
WSRM: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/30087/wsrm-1.2-spec-cd-02.pdf
WSRMP: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/30086/wsrmp-1.2-spec-cd-02.pdf
WSMC: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/30088/wsmc-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf
ZIP: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/30089/WSRX%20v1.2-CD02.zip
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
11/18/2008 05:01 PM
|
To
| Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, "ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org"
<ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [ws-rx] New Editors Drafts |
|
Hi Doug,
Thanks for preparing
the CD2 package.
I notice that TX and
SX specs have designated a particular version of the document as Authoritative
Format [1] [2] in the front page description of the specifications.
The OASIS process
guidelines [3] requires this.
Hence, I suggest the
RX TC designate the document source of the RX specs, that is, the DOC version,
as the Authoritative format.
Would it be possible
to make this change so we can approve CD 02 during next call?
Thanks.
[1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/v1.3/cd/ws-securitypolicy-1.3-spec-cd-03.doc
(Authoritative)
[2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.2-spec-cs-01.doc
(Authoritative format)
[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#specQuality
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2008 5:44 PM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] New Editors Drafts
All,
I've updated the editor's drafts with the resolution to all 3 new
issues [1], [2] and [3]. Even though [3] hasn't been accepted yet,
not hearing any objection I added it to the doc with the hopes of us approving
it on this Thursday's call. The docs can be found at the following
links:
WSRM: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/29963/wsrm-1.2-spec-cd-02.pdf
WSRMP: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/29962/wsrmp-1.2-spec-cd-02.pdf
WSMC: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/30066/wsmc-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf
ZIP: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/30067/WSRX%20v1.2-CD02.zip
The zip include a "diff" pdf file.
Please review these docs as I expect there will be motions made to approve
them during the call.
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200810/msg00003.html
[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx/200810/msg00004.html
[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archives/200811/msg00003.html
thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM | Web Services Architect | IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905 | IBM T/L 444-6905 | dug@us.ibm.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]