RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?

["Hal Lockhart" <hlockhar@bea.com>]

I have been intending to create an issue similar to this one, so I will
jump on the bandwagon.

I think much more can be done to describe:

1. which assertions can appear where
2. what combinations make no sense and should either be prohibited or it
should be stated they have no agreed meaning (example, encryption
property applied to token)
3. how policies attached to different wsdl elements, which all apply in
a given situation, interact with each other.

Hal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:22 PM
> To: Marc Goodner; Dittmann, Werner; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the same
> type?
> 
> Comments lines
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Gudge
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: 09 February 2006 20:45
> > To: Dittmann, Werner; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 28: Multiple supporting tokens of the
> > same type?
> >
> > This is now logged as issue 28.
> >
> > Marc Goodner
> > Technical Diplomat
> > Microsoft Corporation
> > Tel: (425) 703-1903
> > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dittmann, Werner [mailto:werner.dittmann@siemens.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:13 AM
> > To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Cc: Marc Goodner
> > Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Multiple supporting tokens of the
> > same type?
> >
> > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD
UNTIL
> > THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
> >
> > The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
> >
> > Protocol:  ws-sp
> > ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r03-diff.pdf
> >
> > Artifact:  spec
> >
> > Type: design
> >
> > Title: Multiple supporting tokens of the same type?
> >
> > Description:
> >
> > Can a Policy have more than one supporting token (of the same type),
> > e.g. multiple SupportingTokens or multiple
EndorsingSupportingTokens?
> 
> [MJG]
> Yes.
> 
> >
> > Related issues:
> > none
> >
> > Proposed Resolution:
> >
> > IMHO we need an "overall" ws-sp outline to define which assertions
are
> > allowed at a specific level, for example similar to
> > (a)symmetric binding
> > outline but for to top level policy file.
> 
> [MJG]
> The intent of Appendix A ( and other text in the spec that talks to
the
> scope of the various assertions ) is to specify which assertions can
> appear on which WSDL constructs. I'm not sure it makes any sense to
> specify such things in terms of location in a policy file...
> 
> >
> > Werner Dittmann
> > Siemens COM MN CC BD TO
> > mailto:Werner.Dittmann@siemens.com
> > Tel:   +49(0)89 636 50265
> > Mobil: +49(0)172 85 85 245
> >