NEW Issue: Minor editorial comments on security policy

[Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>]

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL  
THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.

Protocol:  ws-sp

ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r07-diff

<http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/ 
18836/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r07-diff.doc>

Artifact:  spec

Type: editorial

Title: Minor editorial comments on security policy

Description:
a) Line 214, remove comma from "The intent of representing  
characteristics as assertions, is so that QName matching"

b) Line 249
s/protection encryption/encryption/
in "The bindings are identified primarily by the style of protection  
encryption used to protect the message exchange."

c) Line 653
Change "Multiple instances of this element may appear within this  
assertion and should be treated as separate references in the  
signature." to
"Multiple instances of this element may appear within this assertion  
and should be treated as separate references in a signature when WSS  
is used."
i.e.,
s/.$/ when WSS is used./

(Note that SignedElements may be satisfied using transport security,  
in which case no special action is required if all is protected).

d) line 1460, are planning on defining the AbsXPath URI in the sp  
namespace, or do we have a candidate namespace in mind? Remember to  
replace TBD.

e) add at line 3545, "This section may not apply when transport level  
security is applied."
(or more generally, clarify what is required when transport security  
used - ie endorsing signatures)

f) Remove Section F at line 3601. Stated earlier in document what is  
non-normative.

Related issues: none

Proposed Resolution: see description


regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia