OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-sx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 84: Assertions with nested policy do not indicate it


I understood the syntax outlines at, for example, line 828, to satisfy
the requirement from line 352.

I agree with removing text that is redundant with WS-Policy. To that
end, we should probably remove all of section 3.1

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: 10 July 2006 16:58
> To: Frederick Hirsch; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 84: Assertions with nested policy do 
> not indicate it
> 
> Issue 84
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hirsch@nokia.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:40 AM
> To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Cc: Hirsch Frederick; Marc Goodner
> Subject: NEW Issue: Assertions with nested policy do not indicate it
> 
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
> 
> Protocol:  ws-sp
> 
> ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r07-diff
> 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/
> 18836/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-01-r07-diff.doc>
> 
> Artifact:  spec
> 
> Type: design
> 
> Title: Assertions with nested policy do not indicate it
> 
> Description: The specification states at line 352:
> " Assertions MUST specify whether or not they contain nested policy."
> 
> However most of the policy examples in the document do not do so.  
> (Only the example on this topic at line 340 does)  Either 
> this statement
> should be removed or the examples updated. This may be an 
> issue with the
> stability of WS-Policy.
> 
> Policy statements in particular: lines 21, 295, 318, 381, 
> 406, 438, 467,
> 503, 3177
> 
> Related issues: none
> 
> Proposed Resolution:
> Remove statement at line 352, no longer required in WS-Policy 
> submission
> to W3C. Also remove example at line 340 and appropriate text.
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]