RE: [ws-sx] Issue 106: Why does a <IssuedTokens> element contain an RSTR instead of an RSTRC?

["Jan Alexander" <janalex@microsoft.com>]

Just to archive my explanation of <IssuedTokens> semantics in the TC
mailing list archive:

Semantically the <IssuedTokens> element is a RSTRC. This means that it
can contain arbitrary number of RSTR elements as described in section
4.4 of WS-Trust spec. Therefore adding a nested RSTRC element to
<IssuedTokens> element would be superfluous.

Thanks,
--Jan

-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:24 PM
To: Hal Lockhart; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 106: Why does a <IssuedTokens> element contain an
RSTR instead of an RSTRC?

Issue 106

-----Original Message-----
From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hlockhar@bea.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:54 PM
To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Marc Goodner
Subject: New Issue: Why does a <IssuedTokens> element contain an RSTR
instead of an RSTRC?



PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL
THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.

Protocol:  ws-trust

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/18833/ws
-trust-1%5B1%5D.3-spec-ed-01-r08-diff.pdf

Artifact:  spec & schema

Type:

design

Title: Why does a <IssuedTokens> element contain an RSTR instead of an
RSTRC or a choice of RSTR or RSTRC?


Description:

Since a <IssuedTokens> element may need to contain Tokens issued as the
result of multiple requests, why is it not allowed to contain a
<RequestSecurityTokenResponseCollection> element?

Related issues:


Proposed Resolution:

Option 1: Permit an <IssuedTokens> element to contain a choice of a
<RequestSecurityTokenResponse> element or a
<RequestSecurityTokenResponseCollection> element.

Option 2: Change the <IssuedTokens> element to contain a
<RequestSecurityTokenResponseCollection> element.

Hal