WS-SX TC Minutes, Oct 4th 2006

[Greg Carpenter <gregcarp@microsoft.com>]

Summary of new Action Items:

 

AI-2006-10-04-01  Kelvin to update TC members only web with Public review info

 

AI-2006-10-04-02  Marc to delve into TC document organization issues and report back.

 

1. Call to order/roll call

 

Present:

 

TBD

 

2. Reading/Approving minutes of last meeting - September 27 2006

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/email/archives/200609/msg00058.html

 

Adopted unanimously.

 

3. TC Logistics (10 minutes or less)

 

Proposed that there  no need for a December face-to-face - no objection

Group should think about a possible  January date and be prepared to provide feedback by the end of the month

 

4. Issues list

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/issues/Issues.xml

 

a) Review of action items

AI-2006-09-06-01 - Gudge to make proposal for issue 90 by end of September

Closed

 

 

b) Issues in Review status

 

  None.

 

 

c) New issues

 

  None.

 

 

d) Active issues

 

i066 - SecurityPolicy use cases

 

Next draft underway.  Waiting for clarification from Tony N regarding processing model concerns.  i066 and i101 are linked by similar processing model concerns.  

 

 

i081 - Provide policy statements and associated URIs that can be referenced from wsp:PolicyReference statements

 

Linked to i066

 

 

 

i090 - Description of Strict Formatting seems wrong for EncryptedKey

 

Currently the strict formatting layout is different for WSS 1.0 and 1.1. Does it really need to be?

 

 

 

i096 - Ensure Appendix A is complete

 

Marc will submit an update in the next day or two. Change status to pending.

 

 

 

i101 - Need additional SamlToken Assertion Elements for Holder-of-Key and Sender-Vouches

 

Linked  to i066 and processing model concerns. Waiting for clarification from Tony N.

 

 

 

PR001 - Question on WS-Trust sections 4.3.5 to 4.3.7

 

Marc to submit proposed changes to the list.

 

 

 

f) Pending issues

i083 - Remove shading from figures, possibly enlarge

 

i086 - No policy support for content encryption?

 

i110 - QName support for specifying elements that need to be present in the message

 

All of the above pending issues will be addressed in the impending SP update

 

 

5. AOB

 

Chair asked who would be prepared to participate in an SP interop. Microsoft, IBM, Oracle and Layer7 responded in the affirmative.  Tony N stated that IBM's response applied to scenarios in the existing interop doc and any additional ones would be considered optional

 

 

6. Adjournment

 

The meeting adjourned at