[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [VER 2] WS-SX TC Minutes, Oct 11 2006
|
[VER 2] Added roll. WS-SX TC Minutes, Oct 11 2006 Summary of new Action Items: none 1. Call to order/roll call Present: Status Change: Dana Kaufman lost voting status. Attendance Jong Lee, BEA Systems, Inc.* Hal Lockhart, BEA Systems, Inc.* Denis Pilipchuk, BEA Systems, Inc.* Corinna Witt, BEA Systems, Inc.* Yakov Sverdlov, CA* Toshihiro Nishimura, Fujitsu Limited* Greg Whitehead, Hewlett-Packard* Ching-Yun (C.Y.) Chao, IBM* Henry (Hyenvui) Chung, IBM* Kelvin Lawrence, IBM* Michael McIntosh, IBM* Anthony Nadalin, IBM* Bruce Rich, IBM* Kate Cherry, Lockheed Martin* Jan Alexander, Microsoft Corporation* Greg Carpenter, Microsoft Corporation*
Paul Cotton, Microsoft Corporation* Colleen Evans, Microsoft Corporation* Vijay Gajjala, Microsoft Corporation* Marc Goodner, Microsoft Corporation* Martin Gudgin, Microsoft Corporation* Chris Kaler, Microsoft Corporation* Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Corporation* Abbie Barbir, Nortel Networks Limited*
Lloyd Burch, Novell* Steve Carter, Novell* Prateek Mishra, Oracle Corporation* Martin Raepple, SAP AG* Tony Gullotta, SOA Software Inc.* Don Adams, Tibco Software Inc.* Ruchith Fernando, WSO2* 2. Reading/Approving minutes of last meeting (Oct 4) http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200610/msg00012.html
Adopted unanimously. 3. TC Logistics (10 minutes or less) Waiting until next month to revisit F2F schedule. 4. Issues list http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/issues/Issues.xml
a) Review of action items AI-2006-10-04-06 - Kelvin to update public TC web
pages with Public review info http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200610/msg00014.html
Done. AI-2006-10-04-02 - Marc to delve into TC document
organization issues and report back Will get this out first week of November. b) Issues in Review status None. c) New issues i114 - Additional algorithm properties, assertions
and references needed About adding additional algorithms and comments/no
comments Why comments/no comments? Looking at what could or could not state which kind
of cannaocalization is required. Started from looking at things expressed in the
minimalist profile. This should not break anything there today, it is
just an extension. Adding the Ex14N assertion does remove it as a
default. When there is an assertion for something it cannot be a default, the
assertion must be used. Others feel that things should always be explicit. i115 - Universal Encryption of UsernameToken (as
specified by Appendix D, d.4, 3.) seems wrong The rule seems wrong as described. This is related
to issue 116, is the rule even normative. i116 - Is Appendix D Normative? Is this a summary or not? The information does not
seem to be available elsewhere. Marc assigned as owner to look into where these
rules may have come from in the rest of the text. d) Active issues i066 - SecurityPolicy use cases Confused as to how policy expression examples without
some description of processing be described. Even in being less specific you
are still giving some description of processing. Statements like “A username is presented for
authentication”. The concern seems to be that the processing
statements need to be made more genericlly. There will need to be some amount
of process i081 - Provide policy statements and associated URIs
that can be referenced from wsp:PolicyReference statements i090 - Description of Strict Formatting seems wrong
for EncryptedKey Update from Gudge: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200610/msg00021.html Hal needs to look into this, should be ready by next
week. i101 - Need additional SamlToken Assertion Elements
for Holder-of-Key and Sender-Vouches 101 is also dependent upon issue 66. PR001 - Question on WS-Trust sections 4.3.5 to 4.3.7 Should have something out to the TC next week. f) Pending issues All pending issues applied in r10 update posted last
week. Status of all pending issues changed to closed
unanimously. i083 - Remove shading from figures, possibly enlarge i086 - No policy support for content encryption? i096 - Ensure Appendix A is complete i110 - QName support for specifying elements that need
to be present in the message 5. Next steps Interop doc discussion, Greg looking at addressing
negative testing in the document. Tony would like to see a CD before starting the
interop. Discussion of what sort of bar was needed to create
a CD. Some opinions that this would entail closing all
issues first while others expressed that was not necessary if we were heading
directly into an interop and not PR. Opinions that people were in favor of a CD now were
heard. No one objected to putting the SP up for a vote for
CD. Chairs advised people to try to get current SP
issues resolved and to read the doc to get any issues on the table. People
should be prepared for the possibility of a CD vote soon. Concerns on the interop doc itself were expressed
that there were still open issues against it. None seem to be recorded in the
issue list. 6. AOB None. 7. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:40am PST |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]