[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 116: Is Appendix D Normative?
We still believe that advice is correct though it cannot be inferred from SP alone. We're working on an explanation we'll send in for issue 115 separately. -----Original Message----- From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hlockhar@bea.com] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 8:18 AM To: Marc Goodner; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 116: Is Appendix D Normative? Ok, then where specifically does rule D.4 #3 come from? (for example) Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 10:55 AM > To: Marc Goodner; Hal Lockhart; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [ws-sx] Issue 116: Is Appendix D Normative? > > I've looked into this and Appendix D was added to SP per issue 33. > > From Gudge's accepted proposal for that issue: > "I think this information belongs in an appendix, as it's really a > collation of existing material." > > So Appendix D is not normative and the material does exist elsewhere. I > believe 116 can be closed with no action. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:33 AM > To: Hal Lockhart; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [ws-sx] Issue 116: Is Appendix D Normative? > > Issue 116 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hlockhar@bea.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 2:12 PM > To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: Marc Goodner > Subject: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Is Appendix D Normative? > > PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL > THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER. > The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred. > > Protocol: ws-sp > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/20578/ws-securitypolic > y-1.2-spec-ed-01-r10-diff.pdf > > Artifact: spec > > Type: > > editorial > > Title: > > Is Appendix D normative or is it just a summary of information found > elsewhere in the spec as Appendix A is? > > Description: > > The last sentence of section 1 says "Section 11, all examples and all > Appendices are non-normative." That suggests that Appendix D is a > summary of normative information which is found elsewhere. However, I > can not find any other source of the information in WS-SP. If Appendix D > is non-normative, then I question why it is in the document at all. > > Note that Appendix A explicitly says it is non-normative, suggesting > that some Appendices may be. Appendix B could conceivably be considered > normative, it is hard to tell. Appendix C is examples, so it seems safe > to assume they are not normative, however it might be good to say > explicitly that if Appendix C conflicts with section 6.7 then 6.7 takes > precedence. > > Related issues: > > My previous issue. > > Proposed Resolution: > > Clarify which Appendices are normative.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]