[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust
Greg, privately, would you then vote NO to ratify the current document and YES to ratify the document with the changed references. All the best, Ashok > -----Original Message----- > From: Ashok Malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 12:13 PM > To: Greg Whitehead; ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust > > So, Greg, you are saying that changing the reference to the WS-Policy CR > documents would have no other repercussions. Is this correct? > > All the best, Ashok > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg Whitehead [mailto:greg.whitehead@hp.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:02 AM > > To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust > > > > I just took a look at ws-trust-1.3.xsd and the content model for RST and > > RSTR is already <xs:any> (the wsp namespace is declared in the xsd file, > > but > > it is ONLY used in comments). > > > > So, for what it's worth, the only binding to a particular version of > > WS-Policy is in the normative text of the spec. > > > > -Greg > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]