-----------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Whitehead [greg.whitehead@hp.com]
Sent: 03/07/2007 03:24 PM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: ws-sx <ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust
Perhaps you can point to where it is expressed in the schema. I certainly don’t see it.
-Greg
On 3/7/07 4:22 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com> wrote:
They are expressed in the schema so I'm not following your claim as it has to resolve the scheama use of wsp:Policy
-----------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Whitehead [greg.whitehead@hp.com]
Sent: 03/07/2007 03:13 PM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: <ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust
I’m just saying that the only normative reference to the WS-Policy namespace, or even that wsp:Policy is legal content in an RST, is in the text of the spec.
On the call today it was claimed that these dependencies were expressed in the WS-Trust schema and that doesn’t seem to be the case.
-Greg
On 3/7/07 1:55 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com> wrote:
I don't think that is quite the case, we need a normative reference to resolve wsp:Policy, so where are we to find this, so the binding is normative now as an explicit namespace is used
Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Greg Whitehead <greg.whitehead@hp.com>
Greg Whitehead <greg.whitehead@hp.com> 03/07/2007 12:01 PM
To
<ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject
[ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust
I just took a look at ws-trust-1.3.xsd and the content model for RST and
RSTR is already <xs:any> (the wsp namespace is declared in the xsd file, but
it is ONLY used in comments).
So, for what it's worth, the only binding to a particular version of
WS-Policy is in the normative text of the spec.
-Greg
