Re: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>]

Namespace is normative, it has impact on the schema to show you what to use for interoperability, are you just going to ignore the normative reference to the namespace ?

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Greg Whitehead <greg.whitehead@hp.com>

Greg Whitehead <greg.whitehead@hp.com>

03/07/2007 05:00 PM

To	Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
cc	ws-sx <ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	Re: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust

If you look more carefully you’ll notice that the wsp namespace declaration is not used (outside of comments), so it has no impact on the schema.

-Greg

On 3/7/07 4:39 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com> wrote:

I just looked at the schema on the web site and I show it there
-----------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.


---


----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Whitehead [greg.whitehead@hp.com]
Sent: 03/07/2007 03:36 PM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: ws-sx <ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust

As I said before, there is no wsp:Policy element declared in the WS-Trust schema file (the only mention of wsp:Policy is in a comment). The content model of RST and RSTR is xs:any.

-Greg


On 3/7/07 4:32 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com> wrote:

In the namespace declaration to resolve the wsp:Policy element
-----------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.


---


----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Whitehead [greg.whitehead@hp.com]
Sent: 03/07/2007 03:24 PM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: ws-sx <ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust

Perhaps you can point to where it is expressed in the schema. I certainly don’t see it.

-Greg


On 3/7/07 4:22 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com> wrote:

They are expressed in the schema so I'm not following your claim as it has to resolve the scheama use of wsp:Policy
-----------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.


---


----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Whitehead [greg.whitehead@hp.com]
Sent: 03/07/2007 03:13 PM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: <ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust

I’m just saying that the only normative reference to the WS-Policy namespace, or even that wsp:Policy is legal content in an RST, is in the text of the spec.

On the call today it was claimed that these dependencies were expressed in the WS-Trust schema and that doesn’t seem to be the case.

-Greg

On 3/7/07 1:55 PM, "Anthony Nadalin" <drsecure@us.ibm.com> wrote:

I don't think that is quite the case, we need a normative reference to resolve wsp:Policy, so where are we to find this, so the binding is normative now as an explicit namespace is used

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
Greg Whitehead <greg.whitehead@hp.com>


Greg Whitehead <greg.whitehead@hp.com> 03/07/2007 12:01 PM

To

<ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org>

cc

Subject

[ws-sx] WS-Policy and WS-Trust

I just took a look at ws-trust-1.3.xsd and the content model for RST and
RSTR is already <xs:any> (the wsp namespace is declared in the xsd file, but
it is ONLY used in comments).

So, for what it's worth, the only binding to a particular version of
WS-Policy is in the normative text of the spec.

-Greg