OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-sx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Do sp:Header assertions inSigned/EncryptedParts, enforce the presense of those headers


+1, that covers it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ruchith Fernando [mailto:ruchith@wso2.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 9:16 PM
To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] NEW Issue: Do sp:Header assertions in Signed/EncryptedParts, enforce the presense of those headers

I'd like to withdraw this issue!

The spec is clear about the behaviour that I wanted a clarification for [1].

Thanks,
Ruchith

[1]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-cd-02.html#_Toc161826512

Ruchith Fernando wrote:
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSION THREAD UNTIL
> THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
>
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
>
>
> Protocol:  ws-securitypolicy
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/22786/
> ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-ed-02-r3.pdf
>
>
> Artifact:  spec / schema
>
>
> Type: clarification
>
>
> Title: Do sp:Header assertions in Signed/EncryptedParts, enforce the
> presence of those headers
>
> Description:
>
> When we specify sp:Header elements in sp:SignedParts or
> sp:EncryptedParts, is it correct to enforce the pretense of *all*
> those headers in the SOAP msg and throw a fault if any one of the the
> headers are missing?
>
> If so, do we have (or is it possible to have) some mechanism to
> specify headers to be signed only if they are present?
>
> Related issues:
>
> None.
>
>
> Proposed Resolution:



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]