[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-sx] Further discussion on WS-SX Examples document
+1 regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Jun 12, 2007, at 11:55 AM, ext Greg Whitehead wrote: > +1 > > Examples are invaluable to implementers and deployers. > > The expertise of this group will be lost once we shut down, so > there is no > better time to document what we are thinking. > > -Greg > > > On 6/12/07 7:32 AM, "Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com> wrote: > >> +1. >> >> Developers prefer code samples to learn new programming languages. I >> think the same is true for meta data languages like SP. >> >> Martin >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Prateek Mishra [mailto:prateek.mishra@oracle.com] >>> Sent: Samstag, 9. Juni 2007 00:21 >>> To: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org >>> Subject: [ws-sx] Further discussion on WS-SX Examples document >>> >>> This message responds to the following questions from the May 30 >>> conference call minutes: >>> >>> [quote] >>> 1. Is an examples document in scope of the TC? >>> >>> 2. What specific examples are or are not in scope in an examples >>> document? >>> >>> 3. What additional work or steps are required before the examples >>> doc can progress to CD? >>> >>> [\quote] >>> >>> 1. The starting point of the examples document goes back to >>> May 2006 when >>> this work was proposed by Ashok Malhotra[1]. The points made then >>> were >>> that the >>> SecurityPolicy specification is quite complext (111 pages in its >>> final >>> incarnation) >>> and that most people would have a difficult time figuring out even >>> simple example policies. >>> The idea was to collect examples with explanations, this would >>> provide >>> readers a >>> starting point for many scenarios of interest. >>> >>> I think the question of whether such a document is "in scope" is >>> actually ill-posed. >>> >>> A more appropriate question would be: is it appropriate to publish a >>> complex standard like >>> SecurityPolicy without an examples document? >>> >>> The examples are needed as a kind of sanity-test so that we >>> can see how >>> SecurityPolicy >>> features may be used to secure message exchanges in a few cases of >>> interest to the TC. >>> Aside from the educational and labor-saving aspects, it is also a >>> indication of openness in that >>> readers need not purchase proprietary products in order to >>> understand >>> the use of >>> the SecurityPolicy specification. >>> >>> Finally, if we look at comparable specifications like >>> W3C XML Schema we find them accompanied by a systematic and detailed >>> primer document. >>> >>> >>> 2. The examples document has been quite extensively reviewed >>> by many TC >>> members >>> and many suggestions for change have been made and implemented. >>> >>> If any vendor has a specific concern with a particular example, they >>> should explain what this is >>> and I am sure the Editors would update the document appropriately. >>> >>> >>> 3. I believe that as soon as any remaining open issues are >>> resolved, we >>> should conduct a >>> CD vote for the document. >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200604/msg00031.html >>> >>> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]