[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [ws-sx] Issue i147: Contradictory statements made for WSS10 MutualAuth Scenario
Issue i147 From: Aditya Athalye
[mailto:aditya.athalye@oracle.com] PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER. The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
Protocol: ws-sp examples
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/24579/ws-sp-usecases-examples-draft-15-01.doc
Artifact:
examples
Type:
editorial
Title:
Contradictory statements made in WSS10 Mutual Auth Scenario
Description:
Lines 1531-32 "Line (M035) indicates the
BinarySecurityToken on Line (M024) is included in the signature as required by
the ProtectTokens Lines 1533-34 "Note that the initiator’s
BinarySecurityToken is not included in the message signature as it was not
required by policy."
Related issues:
None
Proposed Resolution:
I think lines 1533-34 are not required as the token has to be covered by message signature as indicated by 1531-32
Thanks Aditya Athalye
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]