Re: [ws-sx] Ordering of Security Assertions

[Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>]

This is not spelled out in the spec, there are assertions that help guide layouts and processing, like section 6.7

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

ashok malhotra ---10/01/2007 07:00:38 AM---No, Tony, this is not about nested policies.

From:	ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
To:	Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org, Maryann Hondo/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Date:	10/01/2007 07:00 AM
Subject:	Re: [ws-sx] Ordering of Security Assertions

---

No, Tony, this is not about nested policies.

Maryann said that when applying policy assertions to a message before 
sending, the security assertions are applied last.  When the message is 
received, the security assertions are processed first.  I'm looking in 
the spec for where this is spelled out.

Thanks!  Ashok

Anthony Nadalin wrote:

> Not sure what you are asking, are you asking about nested policies ?
>
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
>
> Inactive hide details for ashok malhotra ---09/30/2007 05:31:15 
> PM---On the 9/19 WS-Policy Telcon Maryann Hondo said in the conashok 
> malhotra ---09/30/2007 05:31:15 PM---On the 9/19 WS-Policy Telcon 
> Maryann Hondo said in the context of
>
>
> From: 		 
> ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
>
> To: 		 
> ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
>
> Date: 		 
> 09/30/2007 05:31 PM
>
> Subject: 		 
> [ws-sx] Ordering of Security Assertions
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On the 9/19 WS-Policy Telcon Maryann Hondo said in the context of
> processing WS-Policy assertions:
>
> maryann: security policy says: they have to be the first one in
>   processing on the way in , and the last one on the way out
>
>
> Seems reasonable, but I cannot find where in the spec it says that.
> Can anyone tell me? One of the authors can probably quote it off of
> the top of their head.
> -- 
> All the best, Ashok
>


-- 
All the best, Ashok