OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-sx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-sx] RE: WSSX TC Errata ready for public review


Hi Marc and Kelvin,

 

  Everything seems to be in order – the last bit though is that I need PDFs and HTML versions of at least the stand-alone versions. Do you want me to generate or can you supply?

 

Thanks,

 

Mary

 

From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 11:05 AM
To: Marc Goodner; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; 'Kelvin Lawrence'
Cc: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-sx] RE: WSSX TC Errata ready for public review

 

The TC approved these updated drafts today:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200804/msg00045.html

 

Note that I also updated the schema errata files just to get consistency in the file names (no other changes).

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28149/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-errata-cd-01.xsd

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28150/ws-trust-1.3-errata-cd-01.xsd

 

From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 7:00 AM
To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; 'Kelvin Lawrence'
Cc: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-sx] RE: WSSX TC Errata ready for public review

 

Thanks Mary, all of these comments have been addressed in the drafts uploaded this morning.

 

The one exception is number 5 for SC. That is listed under Normative Errors and was determined by the TC to be a mistake. See issue ER017, the proposal that was adopted covers this.

http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/issues/Issues.xml#ER017

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200712/msg00003.html

 

Updated documents:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28144/ws-secureconversation-1.3-spec-errata-cd-01.doc

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28143/ws-secureconversation-1.3-errata-cd-01.doc

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28145/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-errata-cd-01.doc

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28146/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-errata-cd-01.doc

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28147/ws-trust-1.3-errata-cd-01.doc

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/28148/ws-trust-1.3-spec-errata-cd-01.doc

 

From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mary McRae
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 7:34 PM
To: 'Kelvin Lawrence'
Cc: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-sx] RE: WSSX TC Errata ready for public review

 

Hi Kelvin,

 

  Here’s the list – basically the entire set of documents appear to be Editors Drafts and all need to be updated to note Committee Draft status and the date of approval. Additionally, the redlined OS versions need to clearly identify that this version is *not* the OASIS Standard but instead OASIS Standard (incorporating Proposed Errata) – which will change to incorporating Approved Errata post public review and TC affirmation.

 

WS-SecureConversation

1.       Should be identified as “Committee Draft” and show the date of approval

2.       Filenames (in URIs) apparently reference Editors Draft (ed) – not a problem since we don’t have any specific rules but appears to be an oversight related to 1. Above

3.       Running footers need to be updated; page number placing incorrectly

4.       The addition of a Conformance Section appears to result in a substantive change. That is, if there were no conformance statements included in the OASIS Standard, placing them in an errata places an additional burden on use of the specification.

5.       The change to section 7.1 appears to result in a substantive change (from SHOULD to SHOULD NOT)

6.       The redlined version is incorrectly identified as an OASIS Standard – it should be OASIS Standard incorporating Proposed Errata – Committee Draft and show the date of approval (1. Above)

 

 

WS-SecurityPolicy

1.       Should be identified as “Committee Draft” and show the date of approval

2.       Filenames (in URIs) apparently reference Editors Draft (ed) – not a problem since we don’t have any specific rules but appears to be an oversight related to 1. Above

3.       Running footers need to be updated; page number placing incorrectly

4.       The redlined version is incorrectly identified as an OASIS Standard – it should be OASIS Standard incorporating Proposed Errata – Committee Draft and show the date of approval (1. Above)

 

 

WS-Trust

1.       Should be identified as “Committee Draft” and show the date of approval

2.       Filenames (in URIs)apparently reference Editors Draft (ed) – not a problem since we don’t have any specific rules but appears to be an oversight related to 1. Above

3.       Running footers need to be updated; page number placing incorrectly

4.       Under “3. Normative Errors” recommend placing the word “none” (as in WS-SecurityPolicy)

5.       The redlined version is incorrectly identified as an OASIS Standard – it should be OASIS Standard incorporating Proposed Errata – Committee Draft and show the date of approval (1. Above)

 

Mary

 

 

From: Kelvin Lawrence [mailto:klawrenc@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:21 PM
To: Mary McRae
Cc: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: WSSX TC Errata ready for public review

 


Hi Mary,

At our WS-SX TC call this week, per the TC Errata Process, we voted a set of errata documents to Committee Draft status and further voted that they do not represent substantive changes to the original specs and further voted to start the 15-day public review. These decisions/votes are minuted at [1]. Please look at the notes for agenda item 5.

Here are the URLs for the Errat Documents that we would like to get reviewed. (In each case we have provided the stand alone errata and also the marked up ("redline") versions of the specs).

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/27572/ws-secureconversation-1.3-errata-ed-04.doc
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/27573/ws-secureconversation-1.3-spec-errata-ed-04.doc
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/27575/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-spec-errata-ed-04.doc
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/27574/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-errata-ed-04.doc
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/27570/ws-securitypolicy-1.2-errata-ed-03.xsd
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/27031/ws-trust-1.3-spec-errata-ed-01.doc
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/27030/ws-trust-1.3-errata-ed-01.doc
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-sx/download.php/26416/ws-trust-1.3-errata-ed-01.xsd
 
Please let us know if there is anything else you need from us in order to be able to start the public review of these errata documents

Thanks!

[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200804/msg00009.html

Cheers
Kelvin
WS-SX co-Chair



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]