ISSUE i170: Update XML Signature references to refer to XMLSignature, Second Edition, update c14n reference in ws-trust

[Greg Carpenter <gregcarp@microsoft.com>]

Issue i170

-----Original Message-----
From: Frederick Hirsch [mailto:frederick.hirsch@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:38 PM
To: Frederick Hirsch
Cc: OASIS WS-SX
Subject: [ws-sx] Re: NEW ISSUE: Update XML Signature references to refer to XML Signature, Second Edition, update c14n reference in ws-trust

replace "SAML" with "WS-SX" in description.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Aug 26, 2008, at 5:28 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD
> UNTIL THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
>
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
>
> Protocol:  ws-trust,  ws-sc,  ws-sp
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/ws-trust-1.3-os.pdf
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512/ws-
> secureconversation-1.3-os.pdf
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/ws-
> securitypolicy-1.2-spec-os.pdf
>
> Artifact:  spec
>
> Type: editorial
>
> Title: Update XML Signature references to refer to XML Signature,
> Second Edition; update XML canonicalization reference to Canonical
> XML 1.1
>
> Description:
>
> The Second Edition of XML Signature [1] is not a new version of XML
> Signature and does not change the namespace for XML Signature, nor
> does it introduce breaking changes.  For this reason I believe we
> should be able to update all WS-SX references to refer to it.
>
> This edition of XML Signature does incorporate errata, update RFC
> references, clarify text and introduce the new Canonical XML
> Version 1.1  algorithm [2] as a required algorithm. Since uses of
> XML Signature may specify the algorithms used, SAML instances may
> continue to specify Canonical XML 1.0, though it would be
> preferable if Canonical XML 1.1 support were introduced and used.
>
> Canonical XML 1.1 addresses issues related to inheritance of
> attributes in the XML namespace when canonicalizing document
> subsets, including the requirement not to inherit xml:id, and to
> treat xml:base URI path processing properly.
>
> A summary of changes in XML Signature Second Edition is available
> at [3], and a redline at [4].
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n11/
>
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/explain
>
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/xmlsec-redline.html
>
>
> Related issues: none
>
>
> Proposed Resolution:
>
> Add errata for WS-Trust 1.3 Section 1.6  lines 189-191; WS-
> SecureConversation 1.3  Section 1.6 lines 161-163; and WS-
> SecurityPolicy  1.2 Section 1.5 lines 252-254  to replace a
> reference to XML Signature with the updated XML Signature, Second
> Edition reference, as follows
>
> Original text:
> [XML-Signature] W3C Recommendation, "XML-Signature Syntax and
> Processing", 12 February 2002.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xmlenc-core-20021210/
>
> New text:
> [XML-Signature] W3C Recommendation, D. Eastlake et al. XML
> Signature Syntax and Processing (Second Edition). 10 June 2008.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/
>
> In addition, add errata for WS-Trust 1.3 Section 1.6  lines 178-179;
>
> Original text:
> [XML-C14N] W3C Recommendation, "Canonical XML Version 1.0", 15
> March 2001. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
>
> New text:
> [XML-C14N] W3C Recommendation, "Canonical XML Version 1.1",  2 May
> 2008. hhttp://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php