Re: [ws-sx] Should we cancel the WSSX TC call this week.

["Rich.Levinson" <rich.levinson@oracle.com>]

Hi Marc,

I am not sure. As I said, I have been too busy to allocate a time slot 
to go thru it. Possibly we can just send it to Mary as is, because, I 
used the template as the basis for the doc I believe in Jan 2008 so it 
should be fairly current.

    Thanks,
    Rich


Marc Goodner wrote:
> Does that apply to an examples doc? Seems odd.
>
> From: Rich.Levinson [mailto:rich.levinson@oracle.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 1:14 PM
> To: Kelvin Lawrence; ws-sx >> "ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org"
> Subject: Re: [ws-sx] Should we cancel the WSSX TC call this week.
>
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> I know I've slipped on this, but I am still expecting to get it tomorrow night. It's simply that things have been very busy - I took a look at it and do not think there are any significant changes except I have become aware of the need for a conformance section:
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/QAChecklistV2.html
>
> Conformance Section
>
> All specifications are now required to contain a Conformance Statement, which should be the last numbered section in the specification immediately preceding Appendix A. The OASIS Technical Advisory Board (TAB) has created a set of guidelines<http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/TCHandbook/ConformanceGuidelines.html> for use by Technical Committees in writing Conformance Statements and Clauses.
>    Thanks,
>    Rich
>
> Kelvin Lawrence wrote:
>
> Hi everyone. I don't think we have any urgent items for the agenda this
>
> week. I'm still waiting on the edited examples doc so I can notify the
>
> OASIS Staff formally but I can do that off-line. Otherwise I think things
>
> are fairly quiet.
>
>
>
> Unless anyone objects your chairs plan to cancel this weeks WSSX call.
>
> I'll wait until 9am EDT Tuesday before cancelling the call to give folks
>
> in all countries a chance to reply.
>
>
>
> No response == cancel the call :-)
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Kelvin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>