Re: WSSX Requests a public review please

[Kelvin Lawrence <klawrenc@us.ibm.com>]

Hi Mary, thanks for the fast response.
What the TC would like to do is get this work as far as CS and leave it
there. So I believe therefore we need the 60 day review. Sorry that I was
not clearer on that. 

I thought we had added the conformance
section, if we are missing it (and need it) we'll take that to-do.

We (the TC) can try and quickly  work
up a paragraph of explanatory text for you .

Cheers
Kelvin

From:	Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com>
To:	Kelvin Lawrence/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc:	ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	04/13/2009 01:42 PM
Subject:	Re: WSSX Requests a public review please

---

Thanks Kelvin.

  Is this a 60-day review and something that will
be advancing to CS status or just something that will stay at CD (which
means you don't need conformance section and you have an arbitrary review
time)? Would you like to write a paragraph to be included in the review
note?

Mary

On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Kelvin Lawrence wrote:

Hi Mary, 

The WSSX TC has recently approved an examples document and set of sample
files as a committee draft and would like a public review conducted to
give the OASIS members a chance to give their feedback. We felt that these
documents would help others with better understanding our normative specs
that are already OASIS Standards. 

The ZIP file containing the documents is at [1].  Please let me know
if you need anything else from us. 

The meeting where we decided to ask for a review is minuted at [2]

[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31894/WS-SX-ExamplesDocAndInteropMessages-cd-01.zip
[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200903/msg00006.html

Cheers and thanks in advance,
Kelvin
WSSX TC co-Chair