[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: WSSX Requests a public review please
Hi Kelvin, No, there's no conformance section (should be Section 4). It's perfectly acceptable to write a conformance section indicating that there are no conformance requirements, or that one should refer to the actual spec for conformance requirements, as appropriate. Thanks! Mary Mary P McRae Director, Technical Committee Administration OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org twitter: fiberartisan phone: 1.603.232.9090 On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Kelvin Lawrence wrote: Hi Mary, thanks for the fast response. What the TC would like to do is get this work as far as CS and leave it there. So I believe therefore we need the 60 day review. Sorry that I was not clearer on that. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]