Hi Mary,
We may have had a coordination issue closing the loop on this. In any
event, the current state is that the document has been updated to
include a conformance section indicating that there are no conformance
requirements, along with some explanatory text:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=32098&wg_abbrev=ws-sx
The above link is to the details page, which describes at the bottom
that the doc is updated with said conformance section plus the fact
that no "red-lining" remains.
In addition, we are suggesting that the text below from the document
abstract might be used as the "paragraph to be included with the review
note" (possibly indicating that the refs in the para may be followed by
going to the document abstract within the doc).
Please let me (us) know if there is anything else needed to move this
ahead.
Thanks,
Rich
Suggested text for "paragraph to be included with the review note":
"This document contains examples of how to set up
WS-SecurityPolicy
[WSSP] policies for a variety of common token types that are
described in WS-Security 1.0 [WSS10] and WS-Security 1.1 [WSS11]
token profiles [WSSTC]. Particular attention is focused on the
different "security bindings" (defined in [WSSP]) within the example
policies. Actual messages that have been documented in WS-Security
TC [WSSTC]and other WS-Security-based Interops [WSSINTEROPS,
WSSXINTEROPS, OTHERINTEROPS] that conform to some of the example
policies are referenced when appropriate.
The purpose of this document is to give examples of how policies may
be defined for several existing use cases that have been part of the
WS-Security Interops that have been conducted (see References
section for Interop documents [INTEROPS]). In addition, some example
use cases have been included which show some variations from the
WS-Security Interop use cases in order to demonstrate how different
options and security bindings impact the structure of the policies."
Mary McRae wrote:
526CE9A7-76EB-46D8-82CF-36201190E23D@oasis-open.org"
type="cite">Hi Kelvin,
No, there's no conformance section (should be Section 4). It's
perfectly acceptable to write a conformance section indicating that
there are no conformance requirements, or that one should refer to the
actual spec for conformance requirements, as appropriate.
Thanks!
Mary
Mary P McRae
Director, Technical Committee Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
web: www.oasis-open.org
twitter: fiberartisan
phone: 1.603.232.9090
On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Kelvin Lawrence wrote:
Hi Mary, thanks for the fast response. What
the TC would like to do is get this work as far as CS and leave it
there. So I believe therefore we need the 60 day review. Sorry that I
was not clearer on that.
I thought we had added the conformance section, if we are missing it
(and need it) we'll take that to-do.
We (the TC) can try and quickly work up a paragraph of explanatory
text for you .
Cheers
Kelvin
From: Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com>
To: Kelvin Lawrence/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Cc: ws-sx@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: 04/13/2009 01:42 PM
Subject: Re: WSSX Requests a public review please
Thanks Kelvin.
Is this a 60-day review and something that will be advancing to CS
status or just something that will stay at CD (which means you don't
need conformance section and you have an arbitrary review time)? Would
you like to write a paragraph to be included in the review note?
Mary
On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Kelvin Lawrence wrote:
Hi Mary,
The WSSX TC has recently approved an examples document and set of
sample files as a committee draft and would like a public review
conducted to give the OASIS members a chance to give their feedback. We
felt that these documents would help others with better understanding
our normative specs that are already OASIS Standards.
The ZIP file containing the documents is at [1]. Please let me know if
you need anything else from us.
The meeting where we decided to ask for a review is minuted at [2]
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31894/WS-SX-ExamplesDocAndInteropMessages-cd-01.zip
[2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-sx/200903/msg00006.html
Cheers and thanks in advance,
Kelvin
WSSX TC co-Chair
|