Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions

[Andrew Wilkinson3 <awilkinson@uk.ibm.com>]

Max, Tom

In the interests of consistency how far do you plan to go with the changes 
for WS-Coor and WS-BA for issue 15?

I intend to update AT to describe coor with a namespace of 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03. At the moment I don't 
intend to update the non-normative WSCOOR reference to refer to the new 
specification; changing the list of authors and publication date etc. Does 
this seem reasonable -  I don't feel strongly about this, just that it 
would be good for all 3 specs to be updated similarly.

Thanks,
Andy




Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB 
02/03/2006 16:14

To
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
cc

Subject
[ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions










One further thing.
As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had cumulative
change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have no
approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should be
tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the OASIS
templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't been
tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from now.

Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 02/03/2006 16:08 -----
 
             Ian 
             Robinson/UK/IBM 
                                                                        To 

             02/03/2006 16:02          wstx-editors 
                                                                        cc 

 
                                                                   Subject 

                                       Editors instructions 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Hello Editors,

Per the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get updated
drafts to the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.

Please use the following conventions to ensure consistency:

On the front page of each spec, please ensure you use the appropriate "doc
identifier", "location" and "Technical committee" name and correct form of
statustext.

1. Doc identifier value (this value should be on the line following
"Document Identifier" and in the page footer)
wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03

2. Location value:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf

3. Technical committee
OASIS WS-TX TC
(Note upper case WS-TX)

4. Status.
The first line of the status section should state:
This document is published by the WS-TX TC as a ?working draft".

Please use a file name that is the doc identifier with a ".doc" file
extension e.g wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc
We don't need to generate new PDFs yet. We will produce PDFs whenever the
TC adopts a new CD.

The issues that we want to incorporate in these drafts are listed below by
spec.

WS-Coordination

Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17, (18-21)

WS-AtomicTransaction

Issues: 15, 17

WS-BusinessActivity

Issues: 7, 15, 17,



Regards,
Ian