[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Max is correct. For example, the URIs for the BA CoordinatorTypes should
become:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/03/AtomicOutcome
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/03/MixedOutcome
As far as 2006/03 vs 2006/04 is concerned, it doesn't matter so long as the
editors agree on a consistent choice.
If the editors need a casting vote then I'd go for 03 simply because that's
the month we expect to produce the CDs.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
"Max Feingold"
<Max.Feingold@mic
rosoft.com> To
"Thomas Freund"
03/03/2006 04:32 <tjfreund@us.ibm.com>,
<ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors
instructions
Tom:
I may have missed something in the on-air discussion, but the example given
in Colleen's proposal[1] had no 'wstx' in the product part:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/04/Register
To be consistent, I'd imagine WS-AT would just be 'wsat' and WS-BA would be
'wsba'. I don't feel strongly about March vs. April, but we should be
consistent across the three specs.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-tx/200602/msg00007.html
From: Thomas Freund [mailto:tjfreund@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 12:46 PM
To: ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Max & Andy
The only thing that passed my mind was whether the namespace should be:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba/2006/03 (if we were attempting
to follow any sort of convention).
Regards
Tom
Inactive hide details for "Max Feingold" <Max.Feingold@microsoft.com>"Max
Feingold" <Max.Feingold@microsoft.com>
"Max
Feingold"
<Max.Feingol
d@microsoft.
com> To
Thomas
03/02/2006 Freund/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
02:19 PM <ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis
-open.org>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw:
Editors instructions
Andy:
My intention for WS-C was to update all references in the text, as Tom
indicates.
From: Thomas Freund [mailto:tjfreund@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 10:35 AM
To: ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Andrew,
I had intended to do a global change (including the refs --- and several
additional lines that seem to have been missed in the issue)
Tom
Andrew Wilkinson3 <awilkinson@uk.ibm.com>
An
dr
ew
Wi To
lk
in ws-tx-editors@li
so sts.oasis-open.o
n3 rg
<a cc
wi
lk Subject
in
so Re:
n@ [ws-tx-editors]
uk Fw: Editors
.i instructions
bm
.c
om
>
03
/0
2/
20
06
11
:4
2
AM
Max, Tom
In the interests of consistency how far do you plan to go with the changes
for WS-Coor and WS-BA for issue 15?
I intend to update AT to describe coor with a namespace of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03. At the moment I don't
intend to update the non-normative WSCOOR reference to refer to the new
specification; changing the list of authors and publication date etc. Does
this seem reasonable - I don't feel strongly about this, just that it
would be good for all 3 specs to be updated similarly.
Thanks,
Andy
Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB
02/03/2006 16:14
To
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
[ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
One further thing.
As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had cumulative
change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have no
approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should be
tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the OASIS
templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't been
tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from now.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 02/03/2006 16:08 -----
Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM
To
02/03/2006 16:02 wstx-editors
cc
Subject
Editors instructions
Hello Editors,
Per the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get updated
drafts to the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.
Please use the following conventions to ensure consistency:
On the front page of each spec, please ensure you use the appropriate "doc
identifier", "location" and "Technical committee" name and correct form of
statustext.
1. Doc identifier value (this value should be on the line following
"Document Identifier" and in the page footer)
wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03
2. Location value:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
3. Technical committee
OASIS WS-TX TC
(Note upper case WS-TX)
4. Status.
The first line of the status section should state:
This document is published by the WS-TX TC as a ?working draft".
Please use a file name that is the doc identifier with a ".doc" file
extension e.g wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc
We don't need to generate new PDFs yet. We will produce PDFs whenever the
TC adopts a new CD.
The issues that we want to incorporate in these drafts are listed below by
spec.
WS-Coordination
Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17, (18-21)
WS-AtomicTransaction
Issues: 15, 17
WS-BusinessActivity
Issues: 7, 15, 17,
Regards,
Ian
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]