ws-tx-editors message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
- From: Thomas Freund <tjfreund@us.ibm.com>
- To: Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 07:13:16 -0600
I opt for using #1 (as per Ian's suggestion & using the 2006/03 date) ... just out of curiosity why is it that that the namespace slightly different between the two ... i.e. #1 is fine with just "wscoor" where #2 is "wstx-wscoor" (where everthing prepending that portion is the same)
Regards
Tom
Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>
Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>
03/03/2006 04:33 AM
|
|
With regard to cross-references between the specs (e.g a [WSCOOR] ref in
WS-AT) there are 2 choices:
1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03, which will resolve to a
RDDL doc
2. http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf which
will resolve to the specification document itself
#1 above is fairly common practice and more consistent with the existing
references.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
Andrew
Wilkinson3/UK/IBM
@IBMGB To
"Max Feingold"
03/03/2006 10:14 <Max.Feingold@microsoft.com>,
"Thomas Freund"
<tjfreund@us.ibm.com>
cc
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors
instructions
Thanks both.
I'll update the reference to WSCOOR too.
I had opted for a date of 2006/03 per Ian's recommendation on last week's
telecon:
"We also need to supply values for the yyyy/mm in the namespace. We
should use 2006/03, based on the date we expect the CD or CDs to be
approved." -
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/16930/WS-TX_Minutes_2006_02_23.htm
So, just for the sake of clarity, that makes the three namespaces:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/03
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/03
Andy
"Max Feingold" <Max.Feingold@microsoft.com>
02/03/2006 20:19
To
"Thomas Freund" <tjfreund@us.ibm.com>,
<ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject
RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Andy:
My intention for WS-C was to update all references in the text, as Tom
indicates.
From: Thomas Freund [mailto:tjfreund@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thu 3/2/2006 10:35 AM
To: ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Andrew,
I had intended to do a global change (including the refs --- and several
additional lines that seem to have been missed in the issue)
Tom
Andrew Wilkinson3 <awilkinson@uk.ibm.com>
Andrew Wilkinson3 <awilkinson@uk.ibm.com>
03/02/2006 11:42 AM
To
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
Re: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
Max, Tom
In the interests of consistency how far do you plan to go with the changes
for WS-Coor and WS-BA for issue 15?
I intend to update AT to describe coor with a namespace of
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/03. At the moment I don't
intend to update the non-normative WSCOOR reference to refer to the new
specification; changing the list of authors and publication date etc. Does
this seem reasonable - I don't feel strongly about this, just that it
would be good for all 3 specs to be updated similarly.
Thanks,
Andy
Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB
02/03/2006 16:14
To
ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
[ws-tx-editors] Fw: Editors instructions
One further thing.
As a general rule it would help the TC if each WD had cumulative
change-tracking since the last approved draft (CD or PR). We have no
approved draft yet; the base draft with respect to which changes should be
tracked prior to our first CDs is the first drafts that used the OASIS
templates. In this case, please just do your best; if you haven't been
tracking changes in this way so far then just start doing so from now.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Messaging and Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 02/03/2006 16:08 -----
Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM
To
02/03/2006 16:02 wstx-editors
cc
Subject
Editors instructions
Hello Editors,
Per the discussion on the telecon last week, please can you get updated
drafts to the TC by EOD Tues 7 March.
Please use the following conventions to ensure consistency:
On the front page of each spec, please ensure you use the appropriate "doc
identifier", "location" and "Technical committee" name and correct form of
statustext.
1. Doc identifier value (this value should be on the line following
"Document Identifier" and in the page footer)
wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03
wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03
2. Location value:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.pdf
3. Technical committee
OASIS WS-TX TC
(Note upper case WS-TX)
4. Status.
The first line of the status section should state:
This document is published by the WS-TX TC as a ?working draft".
Please use a file name that is the doc identifier with a ".doc" file
extension e.g wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-wd-03.doc
We don't need to generate new PDFs yet. We will produce PDFs whenever the
TC adopts a new CD.
The issues that we want to incorporate in these drafts are listed below by
spec.
WS-Coordination
Issues: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15, 17, (18-21)
WS-AtomicTransaction
Issues: 15, 17
WS-BusinessActivity
Issues: 7, 15, 17,
Regards,
Ian
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
