RE: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 - Correction in Revision History

["Ram Jeyaraman" <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>]

Ian,

The coordination specification retains all the changes since the start.

Further, the uploaded CD 02 coordination document includes the changes
suggested to the revision history in the email below. That is, issues 58
and 64 are mentioned in the revision history.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 6:12 AM
To: ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-tx-editors] Fw: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 - Correction in Revision
History


Editors,
In your first post-CD-02 working drafts, please ensure the revision
history
correctly records the cumulated changes made to the spec. In particular
please ensure missing item noted in the attached mail are fixed. Please
also ensure that this information remains intact in the drafts
throughout
the standardization process at least until public review. We may (or may
not) chose to reset the revision history once we go to PR and then only
retain history of changes that occur subsequent to PR.

Regards,
Ian Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab, UK
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 20/06/2006 14:05 -----
 

             "Monica J.

             Martin"

             <Monica.Martin@Su
To 
             n.COM>                    Ram Jeyaraman

             Sent by:                  <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>

             Monica.Martin@Sun
cc 
             .COM                      ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org, Joe

                                       Fialli <Joseph.Fialli@Sun.COM>,

                                       Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East

             16/06/2006 00:56          <Ryan.Shoemaker@Sun.COM>

 
Subject 
                                       Re: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 -
Correction 
                                       in Revision History

 

 

 

 

 

 





Please also add Issue 064 because the lines 618-621 were deleted as
well. This was verified in today's call. Thanks.

>jeyaraman: Thanks Monica,
>Yes, we need to mention issue 58 in the revision history.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM]
>Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 4:40 PM
>To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>Cc: Joe Fialli; Ryan Shoemaker - JavaSoft East
>Subject: [ws-tx] WS-C cd-02 - Correction in Revision History
>
>For WS-Coordination cd-02, there is no mention in the Revision History
>as to the decision at the F2F regarding Issue 058.  This should be
>reflected.
>
>Reference:
>WS-C cd 02:
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/18552/w
s
>tx-wscoor-1.1-spec-wd-06.zip
>Meeting minutes (excerpt) 1 June 2006:
>
>    i058 - WS-C:   Definition of Referencing Specification
>    Mark: We use the term as a short-hand.
>    Ram: There are several proposals for this.
>    - Proposals by Ram, Mark, and Alastair were posted to the chatroom.
>    Ian: Mark's text is more verbose than Ram's.  What is in it that is
>    not in Ram's?
>    Peter: The inclusion of other applications that use
>    WS-Coordination.  How many times is the term "referencing
>    specification" used?
>    Bob: Only once.  It is better to re-write and avoid defining a new
>term.
>    Bob's proposal is adopted.  This is to modify the text in the
>    specification to avoid the use of the term "referencing
>specification."
>
>(Original minutes uploaded 12 June found at:
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/email/archives/20060
6
>/msg00062.html)
>
>
>
>