[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Fw: [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs
[WSCOOR] OASIS
Public Review Draft, Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06,
August 2008
Any SX references should look like this:
[WSTrust] OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008
[WSSecPolicy] OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecurityPolicy 1.3, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200802
[WSSecConv] OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecureConversation 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512
Regards,
Ian Robinson
----- Forwarded by Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM on 11/08/2008 18:29 -----
"Mary McRae"
<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
Sent by: Mary McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com> 25/07/2008 13:34
|
|
[WSCOOR] OASIS
Public Committee Specification, Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination)
1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06,
May 2008
Currently, any SX references should look like this:
[WSTrust] OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008
[WSSecPolicy] OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecurityPolicy 1.3, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200802
[WSSecConv] OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecureConversation 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512
Regards,
Ian Robinson
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 25/07/2008 13:00 -----
Ian Robinson/UK/IBM
24/07/2008 17:08 |
|
As discussed on the TX call, the result of my action item to follow up
with the TC Admin on the use of the designated cross-reference change process
is this:
We should modify our references to work-in-progress to identify the level
of the specification we are referring to. For example, where we currently
say:
[WSTrust] WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802
[WSCOOR] Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, OASIS, January 2008
we should instead say:
[WSTrust] OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008
[WSCOOR] OASIS
Public Review Draft, Web Services Coordination
(WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06,
May 2008
At Committee spec stage, our internal cross-references will be to other
committee specifications but we might still refer to WS-Trust 1.4 Public
Review Draft. We would have a ballot to approve CS drafts without any
designated cross-reference changes and to advance to OASIS Standard with
designated cross-reference changes.
If the OS member ballot passed but the referenced spec (e.g. WS-Trust)
lagged by 4 months then during that 4 month period the published latest
version of WS-TX would be the CS but would automatically be replaced by
an OS containing the changed cross references once the referenced specs
were finalized.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]