Ian,
I have updated the WS-Coordination specification [1].
Thanks.
[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/29037/wstx-wscoor-1.2-spec-wd-02.doc
From: Ian Robinson
[mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:55 AM
To: ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Fw: [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs
Editors,
(Thanks to Mary
for correcting me).
Please could
you prepare draft C, AT and BA Working Draft 02 documents for TC
approval as CDs during the next TC meeting on Aug 28. If these are approved as
CDs we will then proceed with an electronic ballot to approve committee
specifications.
For the WD-02
drafts, please update the status to "Working Draft" . We only need
Word Doc format at present.
The only changes needed are the formats of the references to the SX and other
TX specs.
Any TX refs should appear like this:
[WSCOOR]
OASIS Public Review Draft, Web Services Coordination
(WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, August 2008
Any SX references should look like this:
[WSTrust]
OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008
[WSSecPolicy]
OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecurityPolicy
1.3, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200802
[WSSecConv]
OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-SecureConversation 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512
Regards,
Ian Robinson
-----
Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 11/08/2008 18:29 -----
|
"Mary
McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
Sent by: Mary
McRae <marypmcrae@gmail.com>
25/07/2008
13:34
|
Please respond to
<mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>
|
|
|
To
|
Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB, <ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE:
[ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs
|
|
Hi
everyone,
Actually, if the specs to be voted on are going to be different than those
submitted for public review, the revised specs will first need to be approved
as CDs and should therefore be identified as Committee Draft 02 *once that
ballot has actually passed.* Remember, *all* works of a technical
committee are always publicly available; identifying something with a status
that the document has not yet achieved is not only against the rules, it’s
misleading.
Thanks,
Mary
From: Ian Robinson
[mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:22 AM
To: ws-tx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-tx-editors] Draft CS specs
Editors,
Please could you prepare draft C, AT and BA specs.
These should update the status to "Committee Specification" and be
dated when the CS approval ballot completes. That isn't scheduled yet so a
suggested date (that will have to be changed later) is Aug 28 2008. We only need
Word Doc format at present.
The only changes needed are the formats of the references to the SX and other
TX specs.
Any TX refs should appear like this:
[WSCOOR]
OASIS Public Committee Specification, Web Services
Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, May 2008
Currently, any SX references should look like this:
[WSTrust]
OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008
[WSSecPolicy]
OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-SecurityPolicy
1.3, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200802
[WSSecConv]
OASIS Committee Draft
01, WS-SecureConversation 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-secureconversation/200512
Regards,
Ian Robinson
----- Forwarded by Ian Robinson/UK/IBM on 25/07/2008 13:00 -----
|
Ian
Robinson/UK/IBM
24/07/2008
17:08
|
|
To
|
wstx
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
WS-TX
1.2 designated cross references
|
|
As discussed on the TX call, the result of my action item to follow up with the
TC Admin on the use of the designated cross-reference change process is this:
We should modify our references to work-in-progress to identify the level of
the specification we are referring to. For example, where we currently say:
[WSTrust]
WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802
[WSCOOR]
Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, OASIS, January 2008
we should instead say:
[WSTrust]
OASIS Committee Draft 01, WS-Trust 1.4, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200802, June 2008
[WSCOOR] OASIS
Public Review Draft,
Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination) 1.2, http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06, May 2008
At Committee spec stage, our internal cross-references will be to other
committee specifications but we might still refer to WS-Trust 1.4 Public Review
Draft. We would have a ballot to approve CS drafts without any
designated cross-reference changes and to advance to OASIS Standard with designated
cross-reference changes.
If the OS member ballot passed but the referenced spec (e.g. WS-Trust) lagged
by 4 months then during that 4 month period the published latest version of
WS-TX would be the CS but would automatically be replaced by an OS containing
the changed cross references once the referenced specs were finalized.
Regards,
Ian Robinson
Unless
stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Unless
stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Unless
stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU