RE: [ws-tx] Avoiding motions on text drafted during telcons

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

Please let us put this in perspective; we deleted one word!

Martin.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Colleen Evans [mailto:coevans@microsoft.com] 
>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 9:47 PM
>To: Martin Chapman; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Avoiding motions on text drafted during telcons
>
>
>Our course - it's RRO ;-).
>
>I'm simply proposing we avoid on the spot decisions about 
>substantially reworded text without the benefit of time to 
>consider the full impact.  
>
>Colleen 
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] 
>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:55 AM
>To: Colleen Evans; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Avoiding motions on text drafted during telcons
>
>opps replied to wrong mail
>jet lag arghhhhhh
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
>>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 5:47 PM
>>To: 'Colleen Evans'; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: RE: [ws-tx] NEW Issue: WS-C: Clarify normative 
>>requirements for MU attribute.
>>
>>
>>I have to strongly disagree. If anyone is uncomfortable with a
>>motion they can ask for it to be tabled (US style), vote 
>>against etc etc. A blanket ban on such motions is harmful and 
>>may come back to bite us in an unmentionable place, as will 
>>inventing process where no invention is required. 
>>
>>In this particular case as well, we did have a concrete
>>proposal and  it didn't involve pages of text either; 
>>it was well manageable for a con call, especially with irc support.
>>
>>
>>Martin.
>>
>
>