[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Issue 31 - Requirement for coordinator driven completion
Mark, Could
you please provide the PDF line numbers in the referred document that are
relevant to this issue. Thanks. -----Original
Message----- This
is identified as WS-TX issue 31. Please
ensure follow-ups have a subject line starting "Issue 31 -" (after
any Re:, [ws-tx] etc.) =================================== Issue
name: Requirement for coordinator driven completion Issue
type: spec Owner:
Mark Little (mark.little@jboss.com) Reference
documents: WS-BA
specification: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17203/ws tx-wsba-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf
<http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17044/h ttp://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/17129/wst x-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-04.pdf> Description: BusinessAgreementWithCoordinatorCompletion
is not tested for in the interoperability
scenarios. This either needs to be fixed, with some scenarios
added, or we should remove the protocol. I haven't seen any good
arguments for why we should have this protocol within the BusinessActivity
specification. If there is a requirement, then it seems more
appropriate for a separate model (i.e., specification) to host this. Proposed
resolution: Remove
BusinessAgreementWithCoordinatorCompletion |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]