Re: [ws-tx] WS-AT/BA Interop Document Changes

[Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>]

I recommend the latest Candidate Recommendation from W3C. It's the 
direction we're headed with the specifications (IMO) and 
interoperability will hopefully iron out issues with our specifications 
use of it that targeting the earlier release of WS-Addr may not.

Mark.


Doug Davis wrote:
>
> I don't have a preference for which version of SOAP or WSAddr we use 
> but I would like us to pick one for the interop - supporting a mixture 
> is just asking for more headaches than we need.
> -Doug
>
>
>
> *"Ram Jeyaraman" <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>*
>
> 04/03/2006 11:44 AM
>
> 	
> To
> 	<ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org>
> cc
> 	
> Subject
> 	[ws-tx] WS-AT/BA Interop Document Changes
>
>
>
> 	
>
>
>
>
>
> Here are some questions and suggested changes to the contributed 
> version of the AT/BA interop documents, for this TC to consider:
>  
> 1.        The namespace and action URLs, referring to WS-Coordination, 
> WS-AT, and WS-BA, used in the interop message format code snippets [1] 
> need to be changed to use 
> _http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsXXX/2006/03_.
> 2.        WS-Coordination [2] uses SOAP 1.2. However the interop 
> message format code snippets [1] use SOAP 1.1. Should the interop 
> message formats use SOAP 1.2?
> 3.        Depending on the resolution to issue i028, the WS-Addressing 
> URL used in the interop message format code snippets [1] should be 
> updated to use the PR version of the WS-Addressing specification; use 
> of the Reference properties should be replaced with Reference parameters.
> 4.        Should the interop docs use a specific version of the 
> WS-Addressing SOAP Binding 
> (_http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PR-ws-addr-soap-20060321/_)?
>
> [1] 
> _http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17455/wstx-wsat-1.1-interop_scenarios-wd-01.doc_, 
> lines 730 - 750.
> [2] WS-Coordination: 
> _http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17311/wstx-wscoor-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf_ 
> PDF line 84.