Re: [ws-tx] WS-AT/BA Interop Document Changes

[Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>]

No idea why this bounced from OASIS first time, but ...

Chris, thanks I know (I'm on the working group). I just couldn't 
remember the right term that early in the morning ;-)

Mark.


Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> WS-Addressing is a Proposed Recommendation [1]
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
>
> Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com> wrote on 04/04/2006 04:12:57 AM:
>
> > I recommend the latest Candidate Recommendation from W3C. It's the
> > direction we're headed with the specifications (IMO) and
> > interoperability will hopefully iron out issues with our specifications
> > use of it that targeting the earlier release of WS-Addr may not.
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> >
> > Doug Davis wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't have a preference for which version of SOAP or WSAddr we use
> > > but I would like us to pick one for the interop - supporting a 
> mixture
> > > is just asking for more headaches than we need.
> > > -Doug
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *"Ram Jeyaraman" <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>*
> > >
> > > 04/03/2006 11:44 AM
> > >
> > >    
> > > To
> > >    <ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > > cc
> > >    
> > > Subject
> > >    [ws-tx] WS-AT/BA Interop Document Changes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >    
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Here are some questions and suggested changes to the contributed
> > > version of the AT/BA interop documents, for this TC to consider:
> > >  
> > > 1.        The namespace and action URLs, referring to 
> WS-Coordination,
> > > WS-AT, and WS-BA, used in the interop message format code snippets 
> [1]
> > > need to be changed to use
> > > _http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsXXX/2006/03_.
> > > 2.        WS-Coordination [2] uses SOAP 1.2. However the interop
> > > message format code snippets [1] use SOAP 1.1. Should the interop
> > > message formats use SOAP 1.2?
> > > 3.        Depending on the resolution to issue i028, the 
> WS-Addressing
> > > URL used in the interop message format code snippets [1] should be
> > > updated to use the PR version of the WS-Addressing specification; use
> > > of the Reference properties should be replaced with Reference 
> parameters.
> > > 4.        Should the interop docs use a specific version of the
> > > WS-Addressing SOAP Binding
> > > (_http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PR-ws-addr-soap-20060321/_)?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > _http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17455/wstx-
> > wsat-1.1-interop_scenarios-wd-01.doc_,
> > > lines 730 - 750.
> > > [2] WS-Coordination:
> > > _http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/17311/wstx-
> > wscoor-1.1-spec-cd-01.pdf_
> > > PDF line 84.