New issue - WS-BA: Definition of Compensated

["Peter Furniss" <peter.furniss@erebor.co.uk>]

Issue name -- WS-BA: Definition of Compensated
 
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSISON THREAD UNTIL THE ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
 
The issues coordinator will notify the list when that has occurred.
 
Target document and draft:
 
Protocol:  WS-BA
 
Artifact:  spec
 
Draft:  BA spec cd 2
 
Link to the document referenced:
 
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/18819/wstx-wsba-1.1-spec-cd-02.doc

 

Section and PDF line number:  section 3.1, lines  201-202
 

 

Issue type:  Editorial
 

 

Related issues:
 
New issue: Message definitions
 
Issue Description:

 

Definiton of Compensated in 3.1 is wrong.

 

Issue Details

 

The definition of Compensated in 3.1 is "Upon receipt of this notification, the
coordinator knows that the participant has recorded a compensation request
for a protocol."

 

The other *-ed messages refer to the completion of the processing implied.
Since Fault will signal the unsuccessful application of Compensate, the
definition, implying Compensated could be sent, then Fault, is bugged. (It is also over-specific on implementation behaviour). Compensated should be sent when the compensation work has been done, not just
thought about.

 

 
 
Proposed resolution
 
Change to send Compensated when the compensation has been processed, not recorded.

 

(new issue "Message definitions" will affect the exact text)