OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-tx message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ws-tx] Issue 037: incomplete resolution


+1

On 14 Aug 2006, at 13:43, Andrew Wilkinson3 wrote:

> Apologies for not posting sooner to nip this in the bud.
>
> I believe that the latest working draft
> (http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/ 
> 19308/wstx-wsat-1.1-spec-wd-08.pdf)
> has executed the resolution of the issue in full. Alasdair's original
> e-mail points to incorrect entries in the register row of the CV state
> table however, in wd-08, this row is no longer present. Wd-08 also
> contains the additional text in 4.3.1.
>
> The only thing that remains is the editorial tweak to ensure  
> consistency
> in referring to and the naming of faults (the name's should be space
> delimited); this will be applied in due course as agreed on last  
> week's
> telecon.
>
> Thanks,
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> 11/08/2006 07:11
>
> To
> "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, Andrew
> Wilkinson3/UK/IBM@IBMGB, mark.little@jboss.com
> cc
> Alastair Green <alastair.green@choreology.com>,  
> Monica.Martin@Sun.COM, Ram
> Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>, ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject
> Re: [ws-tx] Issue 037: incomplete resolution
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The resolution to the issue included the removal of the 2
> Register/RegisterResponse rows from the 2PC state table. Precisely,  
> the
> approved resolution was as described in Alastair's amendment note:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-tx/200606/msg00078.html
>
> In summary:
> 1. Remove the 2 Register/RegisterResponse rows from the 2PC state  
> tables.
> 2. Augment the text in section 4.3.1 so that we do not lose any
> information
> as a result of removing these rows. Agreed text:
> "Further participants may register with the coordinator until the
> coordinator issues a Prepare to any durable participant. Once this has
> happened the Registration Service for the coordinator MUST respond  
> to any
> further Register request with a Cannot Register Participant fault
> message".
>
> Can the AT spec editors please ensure this resolution is executed  
> in full.
>
> Regards,
> Ian Robinson
> STSM, WebSphere Transactions Architect
> IBM Hursley Lab, UK
>
>
>
>              "Monica J.
>              Martin"
>               
> <Monica.Martin@Su                                          To
>
>              n.COM>                    Ram Jeyaraman
>              Sent by:                  <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
>               
> Monica.Martin@Sun                                          cc
>
>              .COM                      Alastair Green
>                                         
> <alastair.green@choreology.com>,
>                                        ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>              10/08/2006 18:00                                       
> Subject
>
>                                        Re: [ws-tx] Issue 037:  
> incomplete
>                                        resolution
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> jeyaraman: Yes, the proposed change seems fine.
>>
>> The CV table row Register, columns { Preparing, PreparedSuccess,
>> Committing, Aborting }: Replace "Invalid State" with "Cannot Register
>> Participant".
>>
>> The space delimited form "Cannot Register Participant" is better.
>>
>>
> mm1: Do we need to reopen this issue or create another one to address?
> Maybe just bring it up on next conference call to expedite change.  
> Thanks.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alastair Green [mailto:alastair.green@choreology.com]
>> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 7:53 AM
>> To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>> Subject: [ws-tx] Issue 037: incomplete resolution
>>
>> Issue 037 was resolved by agreeing that any late registration will
>> receive Cannot Register Participant in response.
>>
>> However, the CV state table shows Invalid State being sent when late
>> (post-prepare wave) registrations occur.
>>
>> Proposal: to ask the editors to amend the cells in the CV Register  
>> row
>> that show Invalid State and replace with CannotRegisterParticipant.
>>
>> Secondary, stylistic issue. Do we name faults in the form XYZ or X  
>> Y Z?
>> Example: "CannotRegisterParticipant" or "Cannot Register  
>> Participant".
>>
>> Resolutions of 037 and of 050 use different forms. Suggest we  
>> always use
>> space delimited form, as this is the pattern elsewhere.
>>
>> Alastair
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]