[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Issue 092 - WS-BA: specify 'presume compensate'assumption
Mark, We agreed to close the AI during our last call, since issue 92
covers it. From: Mark Little
[mailto:mark.little@jboss.com] To add further confusion to this ... in the minutes of the
f2f is appears as though no decision was taken on presumed-nothing versus
presumed-abort/compensate, but that: ACTION: Ram : To submit text on
presumed-nothing or presumed-compensate. did that happen? On 28 Sep 2006, at 02:37, Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
Presume compensate assumption has some inherent problems as
described below: App1 sends a DO message to App2. Coordinator (App1 site)
decides to forget (presume compensate since no vote has been recorded). The
participant (App2 site) times out and takes the presume-compensate route. But
it hits a snag, and sends Fail. Coordinator receives Fail, but does not
remember the activity anymore; so it does not propagate the Fail to its superior.
This is a problem. Summary: I suggest that we retain the existing presume
nothing assumption as represented by the current state table transitions.
Further, I suggest reversing the resolution to issue 71 so that we revert to
the text: "All state transitions are reliably recorded, including
application state and coordination metadata". Mark.
-----Original Message----- From: Ram Jeyaraman [mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 11:45 AM To: Thomas Freund; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ws-tx] Issue 092 - WS-BA: specify 'presume
compensate' assumption This issue is identified as 092. Please ensure the subject line "Issue 092 - WS-BA:
specify 'presume compensate' assumption". ________________________________ From: Thomas Freund Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:18 PM Subject: [ws-tx] NEW Issue - WS-BA: specify 'presume
compensate' assumption Protocol: WS-BA Artifact: spec Draft: BA
specification CD 02 Link to the document referenced: Section and PDF line number: see proposed resolution listed
below Issue type: design Related issues: Issue Description: WS-BA does not state a 'presume
compensate' assumption Proposed Resolution: After line 73 insert: * In the absence of outcome information
for a transaction the transaction is presumed to have compensated. State Table change: The state table (line 520) ParticipantCompletion/Coordinator
View/Inbound Events/: {Completed, Ended} cell should be: (Send Compensate, Ended) The state
table (line 530) CoordinatorCompletion/Coordinator View/Inbound Events/: {Completed, Ended} cell should be: (Send Compensate, Ended) |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]