Re: [ws-tx] Issue 108 - Other Editorial Issues Surrounding AI#0057Review for RFC 2119 (I#097), Submission 2

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

wilkinson: This revision would leave us with section 4 - AT Policy Assertion - as 
being the only place in the specification where we make a normative 
statement about how a transaction is flowed in an application message 
which, in my opinion, is less clear than it could be. This is what issue 
106 intends to address; note that the proposal is no longer to change must 
to MUST - it's been superceded by the proposal describe in i106. 

mm1: You are correct - I missed the subtlety that the text was moved to Section 2. Thanks.