RE: RE: [ws-tx] Proposal to cancel the Dec 14 TX telecon

[Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>]

Ian,

Yes, it is probably better to discuss the detailed editorial comments during the F2F.

I am fine with canceling the call this Thursday. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:56 AM
To: Ram Jeyaraman
Cc: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: RE: [ws-tx] Proposal to cancel the Dec 14 TX telecon

Ram, thats true, but I was making the case for considering these detailed
editorial comments during the F2F when we consider the remainder of the BA
PR comments. I think we have found it easier, in the past, to follow such
line by line edits at a F2F rather than over the phone. Is that OK, or do
you prefer to push forward on the telecon?

Regards,
Ian




             Ram Jeyaraman
             <Ram.Jeyaraman@mi
             crosoft.com>                                               To
                                       Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB,
             12/12/2006 16:33          "ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org"
                                       <ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org>
                                                                        cc

                                                                   Subject
                                       RE: RE: [ws-tx] Proposal to cancel
                                       the Dec 14 TX telecon










Ian,

On further thought, it might be good to have a meeting this week, and make
some progress with the BA PR comment. I notice that if we miss this call,
we will not be meeting until Jan 11th. Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Jeyaraman [mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:06 AM
To: Ian Robinson; ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-tx] Proposal to cancel the Dec 14 TX telecon

> If we do this, then we have no need for a TX telecon this week and I
propose we cancel it unless any TC member has an agenda item that requires
us to go ahead. Please send any such items to this distribution before Noon
EST Weds Dec 13, otherwise we'll cancel the telecon.

+1.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:05 AM
To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-tx] Proposal to cancel the Dec 14 TX telecon


The only agenda items for this week's TX telecon is the discussion of Tom's
editorial updates to WS-BA following the last F2F. The purpose of these was
to consistently apply the editorial updates we already agreed to WS-C/WS-AT
to the WS-BA spec, and will be tracked as issue 110. Past experience
suggests that it might be better to defer this kind of detailed editorial
review of the spec until the January F2F, whose focus will be to review the
PR comments on WS-BA.
If we do this, then we have no need for a TX telecon this week and I
propose we cancel it unless any TC member has an agenda item that requires
us to go ahead. Please send any such items to this distribution before Noon
EST Weds Dec 13, otherwise we'll cancel the telecon.

Status update:

The committee spec adoption ballot for WS-C and WS-AT [1] completed with a
positive result and so we now have 2 approved committee specifications. The
editors are producing the CS drafts in the various formats required by the
TC process.

The January F2F will go ahead in Hursley, UK. We are anticipating 11
attending in person and 6 will dial in; the number of voting members in the
TC is 22. If you did not signal, via the recent ballot, your intention to
attend but do actually expect to be present in person then please let me
know so I can adjust the catering and ensure you get a wireless internet id
for the location for the duration of the meeting. The meeting will run for
2 days from Tues Jan 16 - Weds Jan 17 2007. Logistics and travel
information were sent to the mail distribution list [2]. This contained an
attached Word file that I also uploaded to TC homepage at [3].


[1] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/ballot.php?id=1157
[2]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/email/archives/200612/msg00003.html

[3]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/download.php/21473/Hursley%20site.doc



Regards,
Ian