Re: Issue 114 - Links to schema in WSDL files incorrect

[Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>]

Having discussed this with the TC admin,
we will need to create new WSDL files at new locations and reapprove our
committee specs.
I therefore propose the following concrete
resolution:

<ProposedResolution>

1. We create 3 new versions of the WSDL
in which the imported schema is properly located.
For example, change WS-AT so that 
            <xs:import
                namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06"
                schemaLocation="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06/wsat.xsd"/>

is replaced by;
            <xs:import
                namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06"
                schemaLocation="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06/wstx-wsat-1.1-schema-200701.xsd"/>

2. We upload these 3 WSDLs to the
OOLibrary at URIs:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06/wstx-wsat-1.1-wsdl-200702.wsdl
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/06/wstx-wsba-1.1-wsdl-200702.wsdl
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06/wstx-wscoor-1.1-wsdl-200702.wsdl

</ProposedResolution>

Once we have resolved this issue we
then need a motion to authorize a new CS/OS ballot. 
The result of a successful CS ballot
will be cs-03 drafts of WS-C and WS-AT and a cs-02 draft for WS-BA.

The specs will actually be identical
to the ones we already approved except for the doc identifier (which is
incremented by 1) and the date. The only material difference will be the
WSDL files.

Once we have produced these new CS specs
then we will need to update our RDDL to point to the newly approved specs
and newly approved WSDL.

Regards,
Ian Robinson

Ram Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>

07/02/2007 17:01

To	Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB, "ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org" <ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	Issue 114 - Links to schema in WSDL files incorrect

This issue is identified
with the issue number 114.
 
For further discussions on
this issue, please use the subject line: “Issue 114 - Links to schema
in WSDL files incorrect”.
 
From: Ian Robinson [mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:24 PM
To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-tx] small problem with TX WSDLs
 

We have a small snag. 

Our 3 WSDLs at: 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wscoor/2006/06/wstx-wscoor-1.1-wsdl-200701.wsdl
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06/wstx-wsat-1.1-wsdl-200701.wsdl
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsba/2006/06/wstx-wsba-1.1-wsdl-200701.wsdl

refer to the schema at the old location.
For example, the WS-AT WSDL contains:
            <xs:import
                namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06"
                schemaLocation="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06/wsat.xsd"/>

instead of 
            <xs:import
                namespace="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06"
                schemaLocation="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-tx/wsat/2006/06/wstx-wsat-1.1-schema-200701.xsd"/>


This is a problem of consistency rather than interoperability since the
only difference between the schemas at the 2 locations is the OASIS copyright
statement comment, but it is a nuisance. Having just noticed this, I will
ask the OASIS staff the following 2 questions:
1. Can we replace the WSDLs at their current URIs in the OOLibrray to fix
this inconsistency in the schemaLocation attributes on the xs:imports?
2. Regardless of the answer to Q1, would we need a new committee specification
ballot to approve such a change? (The actual specs themselves would be
unaffected by this change).

If the answer is (1) Yes, (2) No then we can proceed with producing
the OASIS membership ballot materials. Otherwise we may want to consider
fixing this first and re-approving the committee specs (which actually
require no changes). 

We can use our regular TX meeting this week to discuss this.

Regards,
Ian Robinson

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature