[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy reference description
Monica, I support the suggestion from Ram to update to 1.2 since this is just correcting a reference, with no implication to update to the "latest version". Martin. >-----Original Message----- >From: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:57 PM >To: Ram Jeyaraman >Cc: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy >reference description > > >Ram Jeyaraman wrote: > >> Currently, the reference to WS-Policy in the WS-Coordination, WS-AT >> and WS-BA specifications state: >> >> *[WSPOLICY] *Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy), 118 >> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy, VeriSign, Microsoft, >> Sonic 119 Software, IBM, BEA Systems, SAP, September 2004. >> >> ‘September 2004’ should be replaced with ‘March 2006’ as follows: >> >> *[WSPOLICY] *Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy), 118 >> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy, VeriSign, Microsoft, >> Sonic 119 Software, IBM, BEA Systems, SAP, March 2006. >> >Ram, can you explain the rationale for this reference rather than the >current Candidate Recommendation version for W3C WS-Policy, see: >http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-ws-policy-20070330/. Since we effectively >only use the simple policy assertion and wsp:Optional, and >this has been >maintained in WS-Policy, wouldn't the new version apply? Or, if we >choose, the progressed specifications? Thanks. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]