Thanks
Ian,
I
have suggested text below that includes your change.
In
the text, I have replaced “take precedence over the XML Schema [XML-Schema1] [XML-Schema2] descriptions”
with “take precedence over the XML Schema [XML-Schema1] [XML-Schema2] and WSDL [WSDL] descriptions”.
The
insertion point for the conformance section seems fine.
“Conformance
An implementation is not conformant with this specification
if it fails to satisfy one or more of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements
defined herein. A SOAP Node MUST NOT use the declared XML Namespace for this
specification (listed in section 1.x) within SOAP Envelopes unless it is
conformant with this specification.
Normative text within this specification takes precedence
over normative outlines, which in turn take precedence over the XML Schema
[XML-Schema1] [XML-Schema2] and WSDL [WSDL] descriptions.”
From: Ian Robinson
[mailto:ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:50
AM
To: Ram Jeyaraman
Cc: Martin Chapman;
ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-tx] RE: Issue 118 - Add
Conformance section to WS-Coordination, WS-AT and WS-BA
specifications
My comments on the
proposed new section:
- "the XML namespace
identifier for this specification (listed in section 1.4)" might be better
as "the declared XML Namespace for this specification"
since this is
part of the front page material for each spec.
- The position of
the new sections in each TX spec should be between "Protocol Elements" and
the References section.
Regards,
Ian
Robinson
STSM, WebSphere Transactions Architect
IBM Hursley Lab,
UK
|
Ram
Jeyaraman <Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com>
06/03/2008
18:43 |
|
To |
Martin
Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
|
|
cc |
"ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org"
<ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org> |
|
Subject |
[ws-tx]
RE: Issue 118 - Add Conformance section to WS-Coordination, WS-AT
and WS-BA specifications |
|
Hi
Martin,
Do
you see any modifications to the conformance text proposed below in the case
of WS-Coordination, WS-AT and WS-BA?
Thank
you.
From: Ram Jeyaraman
[mailto:Ram.Jeyaraman@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008
9:51 AM
To: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-tx]
Issue 118 - Add Conformance section to WS-Coordination, WS-AT and WS-BA
specifications
This issue was
raised by Martin Chapman (Oracle) during the March 06, 2008 TX TC call.
Description:
The
WS-Coordination, WS-AT and WS-BA specifications currently do not have a
conformance section.
For example, RX
specifications use the following conformance text:
“1.5 Conformance
An
implementation is not conformant with this specification if it fails to
satisfy one or more of the MUST or REQUIRED level requirements defined herein.
A SOAP Node MUST NOT use the XML namespace identifier for this specification
(listed in section 1.4) within SOAP Envelopes unless it is conformant with
this specification.
Normative text within this
specification takes precedence over normative outlines, which in turn take
precedence over the XML Schema [XML Schema Part 1, Part 2]
descriptions.”
A similar conformance
section should be added to the TX specifications.
Unless
stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England
and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour,
Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU